2025-12-27 07:25:47

Developers' earnings are genuinely earned. The $blind project has surpassed the 1 million trading volume mark, and the entire process was fairly launched.

If a slow rug pull actually occurs, trading volume will naturally shrink due to decreased popularity. But even so, it's hard to say that there is anything wrong with the project itself. Market hype comes and goes, which is normal. The things that can be built are there, and the code and mechanisms are transparent. As long as there is no deception or black-box operations, the project has fulfilled its mission. Some projects may just be sitting too high; once the hype passes, everyone can see their true nature clearly. There's nothing to complain about.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugPullAlarm

· 4h ago

On-chain data speaks for itself. A trading volume of 1 million sounds impressive, but let's check how concentrated those large holder addresses are.

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 10h ago

Hmm, this logic is a bit convoluted. As long as no one is deceived, the mission is considered accomplished? That standard is way too low. --- A trading volume of 1 million is indeed impressive, but that doesn't mean the project itself is good. --- When popularity declines, it shrinks. What does that indicate? It indicates there is no real demand. --- Wait, are you saying that as long as the code is transparent, it doesn't count as a rug? Then why do I find that hard to believe? --- Fair launch sounds good, but I'm worried it might be unfair after the launch. --- Developers earning money is the hard truth; everything else is just虚的. --- Is there any difference between slow rug and fast rug? They are both rugs. --- Sitting too high, huh? That’s a bubble. --- The statement "completing the mission" is really clever. What mission are you talking about? --- Market hype coming and going is very normal. My money coming and going is also very normal.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 11h ago

Hey, there's a bit of a logical problem here. Just because the hype is declining, does that mean the project is faultless? Can a 1 million trading volume prove fairness? --- Rug or no rug, you'll know once the hype passes. No matter how loud the current blow, it's all in vain. --- Transparent code ≠ Reliable project. I've heard this line too many times. --- Developers making money is fine, but the fact that users are just bagholders is written all over their faces. --- Wait, are you trying to whitewash a slow rug? I don't quite understand. --- Wow, "completing the mission" just means taking a quick profit and running? Then there's really nothing wrong with that. --- Fair launch doesn't mean no rug. Can these two be confused? --- Wake up, everyone. Transparency ≠ Safety. Don't be fooled by this hype.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged

· 11h ago

Just based on the 1 million trading volume, it at least indicates that there are buyers, not just empty air. That being said, whether a rug is a rug or not really depends on whether the holders can accept the market cycle. Complaining is pointless. If the code transparency mechanism is also transparent, then do as you like.

View OriginalReply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 11h ago

1,000,000 trading volume is nothing, the key is how long it can sustain afterwards --- Transparent code ≠ no rug pull, this logic is a bit extreme... --- Fair launch guarantees no one gets chopped? I’m not so sure --- When the hype dies down, they say the project has fulfilled its mission, that sounds a bit strange --- Transparent code can't stop developers from running away, brother --- Just 1,000,000 in trading volume, I've seen too many projects --- No shady operations? Who in the crypto world dares to believe that --- Developers' profits are real, retail investors' losses are real too --- Only after the hype passes can you see the true face, isn't that just being late to realize? --- Transparent mechanism ≠ guaranteed profit, most people still suffer heavy losses

View OriginalReply0

OfflineValidator

· 11h ago

A trading volume of 1 million indeed indicates something, but this logic seems a bit shaky. --- Transparent code ≠ won't rug; I've heard this logic too many times. --- When the hype fades, the true nature is revealed. Doesn't that mean it was flawed from the start? --- Fair launch doesn't mean no rug pull later; this needs to be clearly distinguished. --- The premise of no black box operations itself is hard to verify. --- Breaking 1 million in trading volume is quite impressive, but we need to see who is taking the other side. --- If it’s just sitting there after being completed, does that mean any trash can be whitewashed? --- Slow rug pulls are even more brutal than quick ones. Don’t take it so lightly. --- Developers make easy money, while bagholders suffer losses happily. Interesting.

View OriginalReply0