2025-12-27 07:25:45

At the start of 2026, Vietnam's cryptocurrency policy adjustments have stirred waves in the market. Controversy is ongoing on social media—some cheer "A new era of Southeast Asian crypto has arrived," while others cautiously observe whether this is another case of "policy flip-flopping." As an observer who has long followed Vietnam's crypto regulatory developments, this policy change is indeed worth serious attention, but only if one understands the three key restrictions involved.

The core policies are divided into three parts, each requiring careful word-by-word understanding. First is "Recognition of digital assets as legal assets, allowing holding and investment, with ownership protected by law." The significance of this shift is that, in the past, crypto investments in Vietnam faced a legal vacuum—if theft or fraud occurred, investors had little recourse. Now, this situation has changed. Assets are legally recognized, and rights can be defended. For investors planning to enter the Southeast Asian market, this is an important institutional breakthrough.

However, the second policy is equally critical but most easily misunderstood: "Cryptocurrencies must not be used as a payment tool and cannot replace the Vietnamese dong." It is especially important to emphasize—many people confuse "legally holding" and "legally using" these assets. You can legally hold BTC, ETH, and other digital assets, but directly using cryptocurrencies for shopping, paying rent, or settling transactions in Vietnam violates the policy bottom line. Violating this rule can result in fines or asset confiscation.

The third hidden restriction involves compliance requirements for exchanges and service providers. Vietnam authorities are still refining the regulatory framework for crypto service institutions, which means that even if individuals hold assets legally, details such as channels for entry and exit, tax reporting, and transaction record archiving may still be subject to policy adjustments in the short term.

In summary, Vietnam's recent policies do open up some space for imagination, but not without limits. Holding is permitted, circulation is not; individual investments are allowed, but commercial use still awaits further clarification. Understanding these boundaries is essential for more stable positioning in the Southeast Asian crypto market.

BTC0,2%

ETH0,2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

down_only_larry

· 12-27 07:55

It's another case of holding legal assets and using illegal methods. --- Vietnam is still playing word games; holding assets with no use will only lead to death. --- Haha, it looks like we have to wait and see how the exchanges will handle this. --- To be honest, it's still a policy vacuum; without understanding the details, the risks are huge. --- Having channels for asset rights protection is indeed an improvement, but the ban on payment tools is very strict. --- I understand the reasoning, but Vietnam's pace really can't be rushed. --- It still seems better to wait and see, after all, policy fluctuations in Southeast Asia are routine. --- Holding legally ≠ being able to use; this trap is waiting. --- It seems that openness still has many ceilings; caution is necessary.

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 12-27 07:55

It's the same old trick... superficially open but the underlying is full of pitfalls. Holding legally compliant doesn't mean it can be used; this balance is tightly controlled, and a small mistake can lead to a chain reaction of liquidations. Regarding the exchange, honestly, the regulatory framework is still "being improved," which means they could change their stance at any time. Risk control thresholds today might be different tomorrow, like a domino effect happening in minutes. I don't trust this timing... --- The old trick of Southeast Asia policy flip-flops again, just a different name this time. --- It looks good but is actually full of restrictions... the asset confiscation clause is the real killer. --- Here we go again, holding but can't use. Is this a joke? --- "Improving" regulatory framework = systemic risk isn't over yet, and liquidation prices can change at any moment.

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 12-27 07:53

It's another case of "legally holding" but "prohibited from use," I know this trick too well --- Wait, is the exchange part still being improved? This is a trap --- Legally holding ≠ legally using, Vietnam's move is quite clever --- Basically, they want your money but don't want you to spend it, a typical policy --- Southeast Asia's new era? Bro, take another look at the exchange part --- Assets are protected, but spending money is now illegal? That logic is incredible --- They will definitely keep messing with the tax reporting, betting five bucks --- Holding BTC is legal, but if you really dare to try spending it in Vietnam --- The policy framework is still "being improved," this is the variable --- Feels like they issued investors a pass with an uncertain expiration date

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 12-27 07:47

It looks glamorous, but in reality, it's just a copycat. It's still the same story of holding legitimate and circulating illegal assets; it feels no different from previous policies. Is Southeast Asia really going to loosen up? I have my doubts. The real killer is that it can't be used as a payment tool; it seems useless. Vietnam's approach is just trying to take your money but not let you spend it, a typical move. Is the exchange compliance still "being improved"? Isn't that just a reserved loophole for policy adjustments? This time, it should be a test water, I dare not bet on whether there will be a reversal later. It's all just for show; real money still waits for a better time. Three restrictions, but two and a half are dead or barely alive; it feels like the enthusiasm is fading quickly.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 12-27 07:42

Holding legal payments is illegal? That logic is indeed absolute It's that kind of policy that seems open but is actually a nested trap To put it simply, they let you buy but don't let you use You can play with the market, but you can't spend the money, so what's the point The exchange part is the real minefield, the compliance framework is still "being improved" That phrase sounds provocative, and there will be adjustments Vietnam really doesn't lack issues

View OriginalReply0

ChainSherlockGirl

· 12-27 07:37

Once again, the old trick of "nominal openness with covert restrictions" is being played by the Vietnamese authorities. Holding legally ≠ using legally. How many people can be judged differently because of these two words? In my analysis, this is a pretext for retail investors to "hold coins with peace of mind." In reality, the payment channels are still tightly locked. Data shows that Vietnam's current policy framework is semi-open. How compliant the exchanges are remains uncertain, and the probability of policy fluctuations in the future is indeed quite high. Interestingly, the real beneficiaries of this operation are those institutions with strong policy research capabilities. Retail investors, if not careful, are easily set up to fall into traps. Risk reminder: Don't be fooled by the rhetoric of the "New Era." This is not full liberalization. A careful look at the second and third restrictions makes it clear. I just want to ask, does anyone dare to try paying rent directly with coins in Vietnam? That scene sounds a bit intense. to be continued, waiting to see how the Vietnamese authorities will patch up the loopholes in the details.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 12-27 07:27

Alright, Vietnam's current stance is "you can hodl, but don't spend," which sounds like a policy timed bomb. --- It's the same old trick of "legal possession," but the key still depends on how exchanges operate. --- Wait, is the asset confiscation clause serious? --- The Southeast Asian market sounds promising, but with all these restrictions, we still have to wait for the regulatory framework to be implemented. --- Holding legally but using illegally—this difference is easy to misunderstand and could lead to trouble. --- Vietnam's policy flip-flopping is a traditional skill; I need to take another look. --- Basically, it's still testing the waters, and the proper framework is still being awaited. --- Having channels to defend rights is indeed good, but payment restrictions shut the door tight. --- Regulatory details haven't been finalized yet, so entering now carries significant risk.

View OriginalReply0