Among people playing Meme coins, some have doubled their profits, while others are tightly trapped. The gap often isn't in vision but in entry price.
Recently, I’ve been paying special attention to some Meme projects that still have decent hype. They usually hover around a market cap of $30,000 to $50,000. It looks calm and suitable for entry. But I just don’t dare to move because on-chain data makes it very clear—those early high-frequency traders who laid out early have costs only in the range of $5,000 to $10,000, and they’ve already recouped their investment. Now they’re just watching.
If I rush in at this point, with a cost several times higher than theirs, I’d really be caught in their trap. The price might not rise much, and they could sell off at any time for quick profit; if it drops, they might just dump and run. No matter what, you’re the one taking the passive hits.
Later, I developed a habit: before choosing a Meme coin, I must first figure out the costs of the big whales at the front. If your buy-in price is more than three times their cost, the risk is already terrifying. The smart approach is to find projects where the big whales have already mostly exited, or where your cost is close to early investors’. That way, even if you don’t make big money, at least you won’t lose everything.
Information asymmetry is the lifeline in this market. Understanding who holds how much and where their costs are makes the patterns of rise and fall clear in front of your eyes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetective
· 12-27 07:54
On-chain evidence doesn't lie, but the stories in your wallet reveal everything. A threefold difference in cost is a dead end.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 12-27 07:54
That's why I never chase the high; analyzing on-chain data is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 12-27 07:53
To be honest, this is the truth about meme coins—it's not about luck, but about betting on information asymmetry.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 12-27 07:53
That hits too close to home. I completely understand this sense of helplessness. Seeing the tricks clearly makes you hesitant to join because you know you're just a latecomer.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-27 07:43
According to my analysis, this is the truth about Meme coins — it's not about gambling on luck, but about whether you can see through the wallets of the big players. Whoever enters early is the market maker, and us latecomers can only passively take the hits. So, we still need to learn how to read on-chain data, or else we're just taking the fall for others.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 12-27 07:25
Basically, it's about who has the lower chip cost. If you come in late, you're just taking over for the early birds.
Among people playing Meme coins, some have doubled their profits, while others are tightly trapped. The gap often isn't in vision but in entry price.
Recently, I’ve been paying special attention to some Meme projects that still have decent hype. They usually hover around a market cap of $30,000 to $50,000. It looks calm and suitable for entry. But I just don’t dare to move because on-chain data makes it very clear—those early high-frequency traders who laid out early have costs only in the range of $5,000 to $10,000, and they’ve already recouped their investment. Now they’re just watching.
If I rush in at this point, with a cost several times higher than theirs, I’d really be caught in their trap. The price might not rise much, and they could sell off at any time for quick profit; if it drops, they might just dump and run. No matter what, you’re the one taking the passive hits.
Later, I developed a habit: before choosing a Meme coin, I must first figure out the costs of the big whales at the front. If your buy-in price is more than three times their cost, the risk is already terrifying. The smart approach is to find projects where the big whales have already mostly exited, or where your cost is close to early investors’. That way, even if you don’t make big money, at least you won’t lose everything.
Information asymmetry is the lifeline in this market. Understanding who holds how much and where their costs are makes the patterns of rise and fall clear in front of your eyes.