RAG, feedback loops, recursive learning, memory mechanisms—these concepts were still a hassle for many people last year. Now? They are standard features in AI systems. Developers with real ideas haven't stopped; they keep iterating.
Conversely, if your architecture hasn't incorporated these elements yet, honestly, you're probably still at the stage most developers are in. The competition for intelligence has moved forward, and the understanding of tech stacks is also diverging. Building or not building, the gap is becoming more and more obvious.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CascadingDipBuyer
· 5h ago
Haha, I feel like I've been insulted again.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 10h ago
Reached this level, huh? Playing the standard here. I’ve calculated that it’s better to first stabilize the basic framework...
---
Really, last year I was still complaining about the hassle of RAG. Now that I don’t use it, it seems low-level. This pace is a bit intense.
---
Alright, I admit I’m still stuck at the developer stage. So what?
---
I always feel something’s off with recursive learning, but I can’t quite put my finger on it. Can any expert explain?
---
What exactly is the obvious difference? Performance or user experience?
---
Can projects that haven’t integrated these concepts still survive, or have they already died long ago?
---
Standardized, standardized. Once these become mainstream, what will be the next big push?
---
The feedback loop is truly appealing; once you try it, you can’t go back.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 10h ago
The top players are competing again. Half a year ago, some people said RAG was unnecessary, and now it's become standard? Alright, I have to keep up too, or I'll really be left behind.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 10h ago
According to data, the adoption rate of tech stacks like RAG has increased from less than 15% to over 67% in the past 18 months, and a divergence is indeed occurring. It is worth noting that behind this wave of iteration is a dual pursuit of development efficiency and system stability—specifically analyzed as follows: projects that fall behind typically experience an extension of their iteration cycle by 3-5 times.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 10h ago
It's deadlocked. Last year, people were still complaining about the hassle of RAG, but now they've probably fallen behind.
Without these components in the architecture... I won't say more, the difference is really visible to the naked eye.
The memory mechanism is the key here; whoever masters it first wins.
Last year's techniques are now all must-have options? The speed is incredible.
The real gap is created by just these few things. Those that don't iterate will eventually be eliminated.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 10h ago
It's rolled up now, and last year's optional features have become mandatory. This is the beginning of the differentiation of the tech stack.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 10h ago
The top players are starting to compete again; the RAG set has long lost its novelty.
---
Honestly, it's still that group hyping themselves up; most developers don't really use these.
---
Really? I feel like it's still just a bunch of concept hype.
---
Alright, time to learn something new again. So exhausting.
---
Feedback loops definitely need to keep up; otherwise, you'll fall behind.
---
It just sounds like endless competition, a never-ending race.
---
Standard configuration? I think only a few people are really playing with it.
---
Forget it, sticking to the old tricks. At least I can survive.
---
Does it have to be so absolute? It's not just black and white.
---
The memory mechanism is okay, but the others might be a bit overdone.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 11h ago
These things are not in the architecture; frankly, it means they've been left behind, and there's nothing to argue about.
RAG, feedback loops, recursive learning, memory mechanisms—these concepts were still a hassle for many people last year. Now? They are standard features in AI systems. Developers with real ideas haven't stopped; they keep iterating.
Conversely, if your architecture hasn't incorporated these elements yet, honestly, you're probably still at the stage most developers are in. The competition for intelligence has moved forward, and the understanding of tech stacks is also diverging. Building or not building, the gap is becoming more and more obvious.