The big players in the industry are at odds lately! After the FY2026 budget announcement, opinions on Bitcoin's future have split into two camps: one pessimistic side is calling for a $60,000 price in the first half of the year, while the optimistic side is hyping up record-breaking ETF inflows. I've been in this circle for years and have talked to many analysis teams. Honestly—don't be fooled by these surface-level disputes. People are not as opposed as they seem.
What does the bearish camp say? They point out two major pressures: the sell-off cycle approaching in Bitcoin's four-year cycle, and the ongoing "1011 market shock." It sounds plausible, but I think they exaggerate the downside. I ran some calculations myself, considering the liquidity conditions in the US in 2026, and a drop to between $70,000 and $75,000 in the first half of the year seems more reasonable—far from the extreme $60,000 level. Interestingly, even these bearish analysts admit that a dip is a good opportunity to accumulate, and by the end of the year, they expect Bitcoin to surge to $115,000. So, are they really bearish? Clearly, they’re just trying to buy low.
Now, let’s look at the bullish logic: crypto ETF funds will hit new highs, and I support this view wholeheartedly. Major brokerages are already starting to develop crypto ETF products. Once the legislation around crypto is settled and the regulatory framework becomes fully transparent in 2026, long-term funds like social security and pension funds will have to enter the market. Think about it—how huge is the traditional financial system’s capital? It’s dozens of times larger than the crypto market. Just a 1% inflow of that capital could send the market soaring.
I’ve made a rough data model: by 2026, conservative estimates suggest crypto ETF inflows could exceed $50 billion. Once that happens, it will be enough to become the main driving force in the market. In simple terms, although these two camps are arguing on the surface, their core ideas are actually the same—they both believe the market will ultimately go higher, just with different views on the path and pace. Understanding this gives you a significant edge when judging the future trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
liquidation_watcher
· 10h ago
It's too absurd to be bearish at 60,000; 70,000-75,000 is more realistic. But honestly, these people are not really bearish at all.
The bottom-fishing mentality is written all over their faces. They still want to push to 115,000 by the end of the year. What's the logic behind that?
I'm convinced that ETF funds breaking records are real. When social security and pension funds start entering the market, it explodes. The traditional financial sector is enormous beyond imagination.
Less than 1% of $50 billion is nothing significant. The key is to wait for the regulatory framework to be implemented.
Both sides are actually bullish; it's just that their bargaining rhythms are different. Whoever is truly bearish should just shut up.
View OriginalReply0
MainnetDelayedAgain
· 10h ago
According to the database, how many days have the predicted commitments for 2026 been fermenting... The two factions are arguing, essentially just looking for a way out for their positions.
60,000 vs 115,000, separated by an excuse of "good timing for deployment," interesting.
The $50 billion model... waiting patiently for it to bloom. How long has it been since the last such commitment? Suggest adding it to the Guinness World Records.
Listening to the institutions' words is just for reference. They say the path is different, but actually they are all betting on the market to rise. Anyway, if they lose, they can just shift the blame to liquidity.
So, as I always say—before the art of time, all data is temporary.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 11h ago
It's all just acting. The bearish turn to buy the dip, the bullish hype about ETFs... Ultimately, it's all just betting on the market going up.
View OriginalReply0
NeonCollector
· 11h ago
Damn, it's the same old rhetoric. People who are bearish aren't really genuinely bearish; at the end of the day, they just want to buy the dip and scoop up some gains.
The big players in the industry are at odds lately! After the FY2026 budget announcement, opinions on Bitcoin's future have split into two camps: one pessimistic side is calling for a $60,000 price in the first half of the year, while the optimistic side is hyping up record-breaking ETF inflows. I've been in this circle for years and have talked to many analysis teams. Honestly—don't be fooled by these surface-level disputes. People are not as opposed as they seem.
What does the bearish camp say? They point out two major pressures: the sell-off cycle approaching in Bitcoin's four-year cycle, and the ongoing "1011 market shock." It sounds plausible, but I think they exaggerate the downside. I ran some calculations myself, considering the liquidity conditions in the US in 2026, and a drop to between $70,000 and $75,000 in the first half of the year seems more reasonable—far from the extreme $60,000 level. Interestingly, even these bearish analysts admit that a dip is a good opportunity to accumulate, and by the end of the year, they expect Bitcoin to surge to $115,000. So, are they really bearish? Clearly, they’re just trying to buy low.
Now, let’s look at the bullish logic: crypto ETF funds will hit new highs, and I support this view wholeheartedly. Major brokerages are already starting to develop crypto ETF products. Once the legislation around crypto is settled and the regulatory framework becomes fully transparent in 2026, long-term funds like social security and pension funds will have to enter the market. Think about it—how huge is the traditional financial system’s capital? It’s dozens of times larger than the crypto market. Just a 1% inflow of that capital could send the market soaring.
I’ve made a rough data model: by 2026, conservative estimates suggest crypto ETF inflows could exceed $50 billion. Once that happens, it will be enough to become the main driving force in the market. In simple terms, although these two camps are arguing on the surface, their core ideas are actually the same—they both believe the market will ultimately go higher, just with different views on the path and pace. Understanding this gives you a significant edge when judging the future trend.