#加密资产安全威胁 The signal that Solana's founder is gradually transferring authority is worth paying attention to. From an on-chain governance perspective, this reflects actual progress in decentralization of power—not just slogans, but the transfer of specific code submission permissions.

This structural change has a dual significance for ecosystem security: on one hand, it reduces single points of failure and enhances network resilience; on the other hand, it also warrants vigilance against potential decision-making fragmentation during periods of power vacuum. Historically, many projects have experienced governance chaos during the founder exit phase.

From a data perspective, several indicators need to be tracked: first, whether the contribution distribution among core developers is truly becoming more balanced; second, whether large fund flows are adjusting in line with the transfer of power. If whale addresses and early holders' on-chain behaviors show no corresponding change, it indicates limited market recognition of this decentralization shift.

In the short term, this may have little impact on ecosystem stability, but in the medium term, the real test lies in whether the dispersed leadership can reach quick consensus when faced with major decisions. This is a key indicator for assessing Solana's level of decentralization.