According to the latest reports, India's formal pension and social security coverage is severely inadequate. This has led to an interesting phenomenon: many ordinary households consider physical gold—especially heirloom jewelry—as the most reliable "pension" to save for the future.
Many Indian families hold large amounts of gold over the long term. When faced with a real emergency—retirement, medical expenses, or sudden lack of cash—they first think of selling their jewelry or pawning it for cash. This practice is particularly common among low- and middle-income groups.
Why is this the case? Simply put, the formal pension and social security systems are unreliable. In contrast, gold is tangible and recognizable across generations, and in a pinch, it can be exchanged for money. This asset allocation logic actually reflects a common dilemma faced by many in emerging markets: the lack of effective financial tools means they can only rely on the most traditional, tangible assets to hedge risks.
This also gives us an insight—when formal financial protections are inadequate, people naturally seek alternatives. Whether it’s gold, real estate, or other assets, essentially, they are using their own methods to fill the gaps in the system.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 12-27 07:54
This statement is so true, the system is a dead end, so people have to save themselves. India's logic is actually quite similar to ours... just replaced with houses and gold bars.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 12-27 07:54
To be honest, isn't this the simplest form of self-rescue when there is no security system? Gold is a hard currency that never goes out of style.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 12-27 07:52
Honestly, this logic applies worldwide... If you can't trust the system, you can only save yourself. The old-school methods of gold and real estate are indeed reliable.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 12-27 07:38
Indians' move this time is basically a last resort; since the system is unreliable, they just choose to save themselves. Gold indeed retains value...
View OriginalReply0
OPsychology
· 12-27 07:33
Gold as a pension fund, I really can't quite get this logic... No, actually I understand it pretty well; people have no choice. The system is unreliable, so they can only rely on inherited gold jewelry to tough it out.
According to the latest reports, India's formal pension and social security coverage is severely inadequate. This has led to an interesting phenomenon: many ordinary households consider physical gold—especially heirloom jewelry—as the most reliable "pension" to save for the future.
Many Indian families hold large amounts of gold over the long term. When faced with a real emergency—retirement, medical expenses, or sudden lack of cash—they first think of selling their jewelry or pawning it for cash. This practice is particularly common among low- and middle-income groups.
Why is this the case? Simply put, the formal pension and social security systems are unreliable. In contrast, gold is tangible and recognizable across generations, and in a pinch, it can be exchanged for money. This asset allocation logic actually reflects a common dilemma faced by many in emerging markets: the lack of effective financial tools means they can only rely on the most traditional, tangible assets to hedge risks.
This also gives us an insight—when formal financial protections are inadequate, people naturally seek alternatives. Whether it’s gold, real estate, or other assets, essentially, they are using their own methods to fill the gaps in the system.