2025 will be a turning point for prediction markets. Once considered a niche speculative tool, this sector is transforming into a foundational infrastructure that aggregates collective intelligence on a global scale. Data speaks: total trading volume has already surpassed hundreds of billions of dollars, major players from traditional financial institutions and the sports industry are entering the market, and regulatory bodies in various countries are beginning to provide clearer rules—multiple signals appearing simultaneously indicate that the industry has entered a new growth cycle.



This change did not happen out of thin air. Improvements in the regulatory environment, the maturity of blockchain technology, and users' desire for more accurate prediction tools—these three forces combined are driving the industry from the periphery to the center stage. The essence of prediction markets is actually quite simple: aggregating dispersed information held by different individuals through market mechanisms to allow collective intelligence to emerge automatically, thereby making more accurate predictions about future events. This concept is not new—marine insurance and election forecasting have existed for hundreds of years—but real large-scale growth only arrived after digital technology and decentralized networks matured.

Decentralized prediction market platforms launched global public testing at the end of last year, focusing on "collective consensus." The project introduced proof of contribution mechanisms and a dual-token model to address structural issues present in traditional prediction markets. These innovations aim to fundamentally change participant incentives and platform governance, making them an interesting window into the evolution of the entire sector.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
just_vibin_onchainvip
· 13h ago
Hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume? Bro, this time you're really about to take off --- Regulators are speaking up, traditional finance is also coming in, it feels like this prediction market is really happening this time --- The idea of collective intelligence emerging automatically sounds great, but I wonder if it will just become a place for retail investors to get chopped up again --- Proof of contribution plus dual tokens? Same old story, can't you make it less complicated? --- From niche to infrastructure, that's an exaggeration, let's see how long it can survive before bragging --- Did the user base really grow since the public beta at the end of last year, or is it just another vapor project? --- Talking about entering a new growth cycle in the industry is tired, the ones who really make money are always those who got in earliest
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 12-27 07:53
Hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume, big institutions are rushing in—this time it's really different. Speaking of which, whether collective consensus is reliable still depends on human nature. The dual-token model is back—can this approach solve the incentive problem? I'm a bit skeptical. Clear regulations are necessary for prediction markets to thrive; before, it was too gray. Decentralized prediction is a very bold idea—let's see how far it can go. Crowd wisdom sounds impressive, but in reality, it's still about who has more information and who makes money.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 12-27 07:52
Hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume sound enticing, but the real profiters are still the early players who laid out first; latecomers can only share the leftovers. Clear regulations might actually make the environment less free than expected—it's a double-edged sword. While collective wisdom sounds appealing, in actual trading, information asymmetry remains the most important factor.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 12-27 07:46
It sounds really appealing, but can this incentive model truly solve information asymmetry? I still have some reservations.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothingvip
· 12-27 07:43
Hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume sound very sexy, but the real profit comes from those early entrants. The contribution proof mechanism sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just a new bottle with old wine. Regulatory friendliness is a good thing, but it also means some fun is gone? I'm tired of hearing about collective intelligence; the key is whether liquidity is sufficient. Big players entering the sports industry? Then how do you solve the problem of odds manipulation? Hundreds of billions of dollars... Wait, how much of that is real trading, and how much is wash trading? No one says. The dual-token model is back again. Why does it feel like all projects are using this routine? Prediction markets are indeed infrastructure-level things, but claiming they are more revolutionary than maritime insurance is an overstatement. I just want to know when I can reliably arbitrage on this, don’t talk to me about collective consensus. Clear rules make it easier to be exploited; in the previous gray areas, there were actually opportunities.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 12-27 07:43
To be honest, hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume sound impressive, but the ones who can really make money are still those who understand information arbitrage. The contribution proof mechanism sounds like a new bottle of old wine; in the end, it still can't escape the fate of whale manipulation. So will this truly become mainstream this time, or is it another round of retail investor harvest? I choose the latter. It sounds good, but I’d rather see how these traditional financial giants will mess up this thing once they get involved. I'm tired of the rhetoric about collective intelligence; the market is really just a game of emotions. The most critical factor is regulation. Currently, countries are still testing the waters, and it’s all talk until concrete laws are implemented. I've seen many combinations of the dual-token model; it looks good in design, but it collapses the moment liquidity dries up. Good data doesn’t necessarily mean the ecosystem is truly mature; I’ll just watch and see.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHuntervip
· 12-27 07:40
Hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume? Wake up, this is still a small case; the real main characters haven't all appeared yet.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDovip
· 12-27 07:35
Is the hundreds of billions of dollars in trading volume real, or is it just another bubble being blown? I see traditional financial giants entering the scene, but is this time really different? Crowd wisdom sounds good, but the premise is that all participants have brains, haha. Dual-token model... here we go again. Can it still be played out creatively? I believe in the future of prediction markets, but don’t get caught off guard if regulations suddenly reverse course. I believe in scaled growth, but the real question is whether it can be sustained.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)