In the blockchain ecosystem, how points are designed often reveals a project's attitude towards long-term contributors.



Altura's points system handles this very well. They don't treat points as a mere numerical game but genuinely use them to measure users' engagement depth and long-term commitment within the ecosystem.

To put it simply, Altura points not only determine your influence and weight within the ecosystem but more importantly—this thing is directly linked to the reward distribution during the TGE stage. Want to get more tokens? Your points need to keep up.

The logic behind the points calculation is quite clear, focusing on two main aspects: one is the amount of funds you deposit, and the other is your participation duration and activity level. Simple and straightforward, but effective. This design incentivizes early investors while also accommodating long-term participants, striking a good balance in the incentive mechanism.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
fren.ethvip
· 11h ago
Hey, Altura's points system is really impressive. If it's directly linked to TGE, early entry will definitely be advantageous. Wow, isn't this just saying that those who stick around will make money? With both capital scale and activity level driving, I’m optimistic. Regarding the points design, honestly, it depends on whether the project team has integrity. Altura's approach is quite decent. Wait, what about those who enter later? Has the ceiling already been set? Damn, I wish I had gotten in earlier. Can the current participation duration make up for it? To be honest, compared to those purely exploitative points systems, Altura's logic is at least coherent and not as disgusting. This design has some substance; long-term players have hope.
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamervip
· 13h ago
theoretically speaking, if we map altura's points system onto a recursive incentive structure... the elegance here is how they've basically created a cross-rollup state verification for user commitment, right? time-weighted deposits as zk-proof of genuine participation. ngl, this is the kind of interoperability vector between capital allocation and community trust that actually matters.
Reply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 13h ago
Altura's point system logic is indeed quite solid, not the kind of fluff that some projects use to fool people. But to be honest, how many actually stick around until the TGE? Most people have already left.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 13h ago
Point-based TGE allocation is indeed a fierce move, directly quantifying participation into real money. Early birds and long-term players can both benefit, it all depends on who keeps their points up to date.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 13h ago
Early investors are ecstatic, while those who have been running alongside for the long term are actually being diluted.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 13h ago
Getting in early can indeed yield more, but later entrants shouldn't be too pessimistic; long-term activity can catch up.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)