Do bigger cities mean more environmentally friendly? This assumption may need to be reconsidered.
The common view is that large cities reduce energy consumption through economies of scale. However, actual data shows another trend: as city size increases, per capita energy consumption actually rises.
Why? When city size grows, activity density, infrastructure investment, and system complexity all expand simultaneously. More transportation networks, supply chains, logistics, and more complex building and power grid management—all these factors drive up overall energy consumption. Although some unit indicators may improve, from a per capita perspective, consumption is actually increasing.
This raises thought-provoking questions for urban planning and sustainable development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybaby
· 15h ago
Damn, it's the same story again—big cities have higher per capita energy consumption? Then why am I still getting crushed by my electricity bill every day? Haha
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 15h ago
wait so the whole "bigger cities = greener" narrative is just arbitrage mispricing? per capita energy actually going up sounds like classic market inefficiency dressed up as sustainability theater lol
Reply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 15h ago
Oh my god, the data is reversed. I really thought I had it backwards before.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 15h ago
I've been through it all. This set of logic is the same as the pie-in-the-sky promises made by project teams in 2018—claiming that economies of scale can reduce costs. But what happened? As complexity increased, costs actually doubled. Cities are no different from Ponzi schemes; the data looks good, but the real truth is in per capita consumption, and that can't be fooled.
Do bigger cities mean more environmentally friendly? This assumption may need to be reconsidered.
The common view is that large cities reduce energy consumption through economies of scale. However, actual data shows another trend: as city size increases, per capita energy consumption actually rises.
Why? When city size grows, activity density, infrastructure investment, and system complexity all expand simultaneously. More transportation networks, supply chains, logistics, and more complex building and power grid management—all these factors drive up overall energy consumption. Although some unit indicators may improve, from a per capita perspective, consumption is actually increasing.
This raises thought-provoking questions for urban planning and sustainable development.