2025-12-27 07:21:04

What exactly is Miniverse? In simple terms, it breaks the traditional patterns of VC games and corporate projects. Essentially, this project has built a self-reinforcing CoFi economic system—without centralized control held by any team.

From a mechanism perspective, the entire value distribution system is ensured fairness through code and mathematical rules. What does this mean? It means that the profits for each participant are transparent and traceable, with no hidden manipulations.

The three main pillars of the project are: a fair token issuance model, an ecosystem truly driven by the community, and a deflationary mechanism design. These three elements work together to form a coherent cycle.

Most importantly—ownership of this ecosystem belongs to the community, not a centralized entity. That is the core idea Miniverse aims to convey.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UncleWhale

· 10h ago

Community ownership sounds great, but how many projects are truly willing to relinquish control completely?

View OriginalReply0

DataBartender

· 10h ago

Wow, another promise of "community ownership." I'm starting to get a bit tired of hearing it... What really piques my curiosity is, if the code can guarantee fairness, what about human nature? It sounds great in theory, but how does it actually run in practice? Wait, I didn't quite understand how this CoFi economic system specifically operates. The deflationary design sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another way to cut the leeks. No centralized control sounds appealing, but who will decide the project's direction? I just want to know, can this system really withstand large investors dumping their holdings? Alright, at least the concept is correct; now it depends on the execution. Code and mathematical rules can't save human nature, brother. If this thing can really be achieved, it would be revolutionary, but... It sounds like every new project wants to tell that story? Let's wait and see when the data goes on-chain.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 10h ago

Uh, this is another story of "community ownership." Every time it's said like this, but in the end, it still depends on who is actually doing the work. It sounds very idealistic, but can CoFi really be self-consistent? I'm a bit skeptical. Code can deceive, mathematical rules can be manipulated, but ultimately, it comes down to execution. In this kind of zero-centralization design, do you know how the positions are allocated? I want to believe, but I'm also afraid to believe too fully... Maybe I'll try some tokens first and see.

View OriginalReply0