A custodial wallet of a certain centralized trading platform was attacked due to a system vulnerability, resulting in user asset losses. This incident has hurt many people.
But it also exposes a more painful reality — many public blockchains boast about building decentralized network systems, but how many users actually understand that when they open their wallets and initiate transactions every day, they are still dealing with some centralized intermediary? The wallet you use might be hosted on the platform, the nodes you access might also be provided by centralized service providers, and even balance inquiries may rely on their APIs.
Between the ideals of decentralization and practical applications, there always seems to be an invisible wall.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 2h ago
Once again, a scene of getting chopped, falsely claiming it's a "system vulnerability."
They run away themselves, where's the responsibility?
Decentralized? Ha, it's all a scam to fool fools. In the end, centralized control still rules.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiOrRekt
· 9h ago
Here we go again? I already said that so-called decentralization is a joke. Users are still dreaming.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeek
· 9h ago
Another wave of people got scammed, this is the current state of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 9h ago
Here we go again, with this set of excuses. To put it plainly, it's just self-deception.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_ngmi
· 9h ago
Once again, we've been cut off, this time it's the custodial wallet's turn to fail.
Really, decentralization is just a joke.
We were promised autonomous assets, but in the end, it still depends on the platform's mood.
API dependency syndrome sufferers, that's all of us.
A custodial wallet of a certain centralized trading platform was attacked due to a system vulnerability, resulting in user asset losses. This incident has hurt many people.
But it also exposes a more painful reality — many public blockchains boast about building decentralized network systems, but how many users actually understand that when they open their wallets and initiate transactions every day, they are still dealing with some centralized intermediary? The wallet you use might be hosted on the platform, the nodes you access might also be provided by centralized service providers, and even balance inquiries may rely on their APIs.
Between the ideals of decentralization and practical applications, there always seems to be an invisible wall.