#美联储回购协议计划 The truly enduring DOGE story actually cannot be separated from the continuous refinement by the community. Many projects within the $ETH ecosystem are also following this path—relying on loyal fans' perseverance and innovative iterations to gradually establish genuine liquidity and ecological recognition. We are optimistic about the long-term development approach, avoiding the虚concepts of overnight wealth.
Recently, the Federal Reserve's repurchase agreement plans have been frequently making headlines, and changes in market liquidity directly impact the trends of mainstream cryptocurrencies. In this macro context, sticking to projects with solid fundamentals and coins with community consensus has become the safest choice. Interested in discussing how everyone views the current market rhythm?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinSkeptic
· 15h ago
Speaking of which, community strength indeed shouldn't be underestimated, but how many people can truly persevere now? The illusion of overnight wealth has long been ingrained in the DNA of the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 15h ago
The idea of community consensus sounds good, but the reality is that most people are still just gambling on luck. Looking at DOGE over the years, there is indeed faith, but it can't withstand the fact that every time there's a surge, a bunch of people rush in and out. Liquidity has been built up, but the quality varies greatly.
As for projects in the ETH ecosystem, honestly, few can survive two cycles. No matter how strong the community consensus is, it still collapses during a bear market. The Federal Reserve's play indeed affects the rhythm, but using this as an excuse to say that the most stable long-term builders are mostly just self-soothing those who are trapped.
To be honest, projects with solid fundamentals are always a minority; most still have to rely on luck and timing. It's not that long-term investing is wrong, but the definition of "long-term" in this market is very different from traditional investing.
View OriginalReply0
BlockImposter
· 15h ago
Projects that rely on community support can indeed survive, but I think it's more about good luck and hitting the right timing.
The DOGE example is a bit special; after all, not all coins can be pumped just by Musk's words.
With such a big move from the Federal Reserve, I'm more concerned about when liquidity can truly stabilize.
Honestly, it still depends on the fundamentals, but even the fundamentals are quite volatile.
#美联储回购协议计划 The truly enduring DOGE story actually cannot be separated from the continuous refinement by the community. Many projects within the $ETH ecosystem are also following this path—relying on loyal fans' perseverance and innovative iterations to gradually establish genuine liquidity and ecological recognition. We are optimistic about the long-term development approach, avoiding the虚concepts of overnight wealth.
Recently, the Federal Reserve's repurchase agreement plans have been frequently making headlines, and changes in market liquidity directly impact the trends of mainstream cryptocurrencies. In this macro context, sticking to projects with solid fundamentals and coins with community consensus has become the safest choice. Interested in discussing how everyone views the current market rhythm?