Many people manage funds the same way as turning a light switch—when the market heats up, they go all in; when they sense risk, they immediately clear all positions. Under this all-or-nothing approach, your money is always swinging between two extremes, moving wildly today and dead silent tomorrow.
But those who truly understand capital know that capital operation is actually a precise system, not a simple switch. Frequent trading ≠ efficient operation; it’s actually a waste.
This is why some protocols have such counterintuitive underlying logic: they don’t make you feel your funds are jumping every second, but instead build a mechanism that can perform stably regardless of how much pressure testing it undergoes.
**What is the most expensive cost? Uncertainty.**
You never know if your collateral will be liquidated tomorrow or if your yield strategies will still work next month. The market is full of black boxes.
What do truly good protocols do? They push this uncertainty to the limit:
First, through over-collateralization design, liquidation risk is no longer a sudden nightmare but an inherent part of the system. Asset safety becomes the default state.
Second, yield sources do not rely on a single market. Multiple arbitrage strategies are deployed, smoothing out cyclical fluctuations. You won’t lose everything just because one market crashes.
Third, system behavior is completely transparent. How capital flows within the protocol and how yields are generated are all traceable and predictable, with no sudden shocks.
How significant is the mindset shift this brings? You don’t need to watch the market constantly or operate frequently. Your money automatically circulates within a stable system, continuously generating predictable cash flow. The compound interest effect from this predictability far exceeds the gains from frantic chasing and panic selling.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedWhale
· 10h ago
Well said, but does anyone really manage to avoid watching the market? I haven't seen it myself anyway.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 10h ago
There's nothing wrong with that, but how many real protocols can actually achieve these three points?
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 10h ago
There's nothing wrong with what you said, but I still can't change my habit of frequent operations...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 10h ago
Well said, all in all out is indeed a common problem among retail investors. I've also suffered quite a few losses myself.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 10h ago
That's right, but I'm just worried about those guys who watch the market all day long; in the end, their profits are all eaten up by transaction fees.
View OriginalReply0
ApeDegen
· 10h ago
To be honest, I've seen too many people ruin themselves this way. Going all in and all out, in the end, nothing is left.
Many people manage funds the same way as turning a light switch—when the market heats up, they go all in; when they sense risk, they immediately clear all positions. Under this all-or-nothing approach, your money is always swinging between two extremes, moving wildly today and dead silent tomorrow.
But those who truly understand capital know that capital operation is actually a precise system, not a simple switch. Frequent trading ≠ efficient operation; it’s actually a waste.
This is why some protocols have such counterintuitive underlying logic: they don’t make you feel your funds are jumping every second, but instead build a mechanism that can perform stably regardless of how much pressure testing it undergoes.
**What is the most expensive cost? Uncertainty.**
You never know if your collateral will be liquidated tomorrow or if your yield strategies will still work next month. The market is full of black boxes.
What do truly good protocols do? They push this uncertainty to the limit:
First, through over-collateralization design, liquidation risk is no longer a sudden nightmare but an inherent part of the system. Asset safety becomes the default state.
Second, yield sources do not rely on a single market. Multiple arbitrage strategies are deployed, smoothing out cyclical fluctuations. You won’t lose everything just because one market crashes.
Third, system behavior is completely transparent. How capital flows within the protocol and how yields are generated are all traceable and predictable, with no sudden shocks.
How significant is the mindset shift this brings? You don’t need to watch the market constantly or operate frequently. Your money automatically circulates within a stable system, continuously generating predictable cash flow. The compound interest effect from this predictability far exceeds the gains from frantic chasing and panic selling.