2025-12-27 06:22:24

Inflation continues to erode purchasing power, data breaches occur frequently, and financial scrutiny is everywhere—these issues have become stubborn problems of the traditional financial system.

The emergence of cryptocurrencies is a direct response to all of this. We need a truly decentralized, highly transparent financial future that anyone can participate in.

This is not just technological innovation, but also a transfer of power—from institutions back to individuals.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkThisDAO

· 16h ago

What's going on? Isn't this exactly what we've been shouting about? Finally, someone has spoken it out clearly. Power back into individuals' hands? That's true financial freedom; everything else is nonsense. The old tricks of banks should have been left behind long ago.

View OriginalReply0

LightningClicker

· 16h ago

I quite agree with the idea of power transfer; it's just that too many people are still brainwashed right now. That's right, traditional finance is just bloodsucking, and BTC should have been popularized long ago. Sounds good, but the problem is that most people simply can't use decentralization well and are more likely to be scammed. This logic isn't wrong; in the face of inflation, everyone is shrinking, so we have to find an outlet. The idea is good, but who is really using crypto for daily transactions now... I love hearing about the transfer of power, but it still depends on whether it can truly be implemented. Talking the talk without walking the walk is just playing tricks.

View OriginalReply0

NestedFox

· 16h ago

Basically, traditional finance is slowly bleeding us dry. Our money keeps devaluing day by day, what else can we do? Decentralization sounds great, but how much of it actually reaches our hands?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 16h ago

Damn, you're right. Banks should have gone bankrupt a long time ago. --- Inflation really messes with people's minds. Might as well hodl coins. --- Power transfer? Just listen to it. There are whales on the chain also pressing you down. --- Decentralization is ideal, but in reality, it still depends on which chain doesn't lag. --- Banks' old ways are tired, but crypto also needs to guard against scammers. --- No matter how good it sounds, it all depends on how much you can earn. That's the real truth. --- Traditional finance is indeed garbage, but don't expect a coin to save the world. --- Regulatory scrutiny by institutions is annoying as hell. The path of decentralization must be taken. --- Buying coins is a rebellion against inflation. No problem with that. --- Who said power has returned to individuals? I'm still being controlled by K-line.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 16h ago

Well... that's true, but it's still early to say these will really be achieved. Traditional finance is indeed terrible, but the crypto world hasn't avoided crashes either; we need to stay alert. Decentralization sounds great, but how many people actually benefit from it? Inflation is really tough; HODL can resist it but it's not a cure-all. Decentralization sounds good, but big players still dominate and harvest retail investors. This wave is indeed a challenge to the existing system, but the road is still long.

View OriginalReply0

SeeYouInFourYears

· 16h ago

Power transfer is a good way to put it, but the problem is that most people are still being exploited. Shouting decentralization every day, but isn't it just the big players cutting the leeks? This round of inflation is really fierce; my salary isn't enough to fill the gaps. That's right, it's just a matter of whether we can really achieve transparency now. Honestly, the traditional financial system definitely needs to be reformed. Wait, if decentralization goes wrong, who do we turn to? It's already been censored this much; we should have rebelled long ago. It sounds good, but how does it work in practice? Power is in the hands of individuals, but someone needs to understand how to manage it. I just want to ask, is it really safe for ordinary people to participate?

View OriginalReply0