Many projects in the NFT ecosystem follow the same path: explosive popularity → airdrop frenzy → cooling down → gradual disappearance. But some platforms have developed different strategies. Through more detailed mechanism design, they have retained users and revitalized the ecosystem. This difference is worth pondering—what exactly allows some projects to maintain their popularity while others fade away quickly?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractHunter
· 10h ago
The real test is ahead. During the airdrop frenzy, anyone could become popular, but only those who survive are the true designers.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 19h ago
Basically, it's the fate of the airdrop economy. After getting tired of the vampire mechanism, you still need real money to build the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 19h ago
Basically, it's still about mechanism design. Airdrops can attract a wave of users, but they can't retain people.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 19h ago
Really, most projects are just airdrop harvesters, no wonder people are fleeing.
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 19h ago
That's why I'm still on the sidelines; truly viable projects are indeed few and far between.
Many projects in the NFT ecosystem follow the same path: explosive popularity → airdrop frenzy → cooling down → gradual disappearance. But some platforms have developed different strategies. Through more detailed mechanism design, they have retained users and revitalized the ecosystem. This difference is worth pondering—what exactly allows some projects to maintain their popularity while others fade away quickly?