Interesting things happened this week. First, someone in the group mentioned that solid-state battery materials are worth paying attention to, and as a result, the sector took off directly, with several leading stocks gaining over 30%. But what really made me think was the deeper underlying issue.



A friend asked me yesterday: "How can retail investors quickly grasp the true production capacity and supply chain dynamics of these new energy companies? Waiting for the financial reports to be public is too late." This one sentence struck a chord with me—essentially, making money depends on having an information advantage that is half a step ahead of the market. But this is precisely where retail investors are most powerless.

Institutions can spend money on satellite data monitoring factories, hire teams to research supply chains, and they monopolize the freshest firsthand information. And us? We can only stare at delayed financial reports and muddle through with mixed rumors. This unfair game rule makes people feel cold behind their backs.

It wasn't until I delved into a certain oracle project that I realized someone is doing one thing—taking the "information gap" weapon away from institutions and sharing it with every ordinary person.

The core idea is: if factory data, logistics dynamics, and other key indicators can be on-chain as transparent assets, then the cost for retail investors to access firsthand information can be reduced to the same level as institutions. No longer delayed financial reports and rumors, but real-time on-chain data.

This change is not just about a single project; it’s about the entire flow of information in the investment market. It’s worth paying attention to the progress in this direction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTPessimistvip
· 7h ago
It sounds like a new set of buzzwords wrapping old tricks; after ten years, the issue of information transparency remains the same.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 11h ago
The satellite monitoring factory gameplay is indeed mastered by institutions, while we retail investors just wait for the financial reports to enjoy the soup.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 11h ago
Information asymmetry is money asymmetry, and that's really true. But transparency on the blockchain... sounds great, but in reality? We still have to wait until the day it truly lands.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKingvip
· 11h ago
Satellite monitoring, firsthand data... sounds pretty good, but can you really trust it once it's on the chain? Or is it just another excuse to scam investors?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 11h ago
Information asymmetry is indeed a valid point, but can on-chain data truly achieve "transparency"? I think we need to surf another cycle to find out... Will institutions obediently put their data on the chain?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 12h ago
Damn, this is what I want to hear—breaking the information gap? Transparency in on-chain data? So retail investors have a chance to turn things around.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)