The truly interesting aspect of Orderly Network's Vanguard mechanism is less about "quick returns" and more about demonstrating a restraint towards the long-term ecosystem.
Many projects like to use aggressive incentive policies to pile up short-term data — seemingly lively but actually superficial. This design chooses a more difficult path: how to make trading activities genuinely and sustainably happen, and then reasonably distribute the value generated from transactions to participants who truly generate usage.
This is not about chasing the hot trend, but about building a self-sustaining ecological cycle. The focus shifts from "user acquisition speed" to "retention quality." It may seem slower, but in reality, it goes further.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryer
· 6h ago
Well said, this is the proper way to do things. Projects that constantly bombard with airdrops and promise 100% returns should have already reflected on themselves.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecoder
· 8h ago
This approach is indeed rare. Compared to those projects that spend crazy amounts of money to acquire users, this restraint seems a bit old-fashioned... But maybe this is the kind that can last the longest?
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 23h ago
Restraint is actually the most ruthless. It's much more reliable than projects that constantly Airdrop and dump. Finally, I see someone caring about the sustainability of the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 12-27 05:51
No way, really? This is exactly what I wanted to see! Finally, there's a project that dares to ditch the superficial incentive game, it's awesome.
View OriginalReply0
HashBandit
· 12-27 05:50
yo this actually hits different... restraint in crypto? that's like asking miners to voluntarily reduce hashrate back in my mining days lol. but real talk, the sustainability angle here is 🔥 — actual trading volume beats inflated metrics any day. most projects pump then dump their own tokenomics, this reads like they're thinking past week one
Reply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-27 05:44
This approach is more reliable than most projects... But can it really be sustained? It still depends on whether the trading volume can stay steady in the future.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 12-27 05:23
To be honest, I am optimistic about this disciplined approach. Too many projects are eager for quick gains and end up becoming empty shells. Orderly genuinely wants to create something meaningful, rather than just taking a quick profit and running away.
The truly interesting aspect of Orderly Network's Vanguard mechanism is less about "quick returns" and more about demonstrating a restraint towards the long-term ecosystem.
Many projects like to use aggressive incentive policies to pile up short-term data — seemingly lively but actually superficial. This design chooses a more difficult path: how to make trading activities genuinely and sustainably happen, and then reasonably distribute the value generated from transactions to participants who truly generate usage.
This is not about chasing the hot trend, but about building a self-sustaining ecological cycle. The focus shifts from "user acquisition speed" to "retention quality." It may seem slower, but in reality, it goes further.