When it comes to NFT investing, many people instinctively say "It's been completely cooled off." Last week, some friends learned that I still hold NFTs, and a hint of surprise flashed in their eyes—since the second half of 2022, the entire NFT market has been in a prolonged downturn. Digital collectibles that once soared to astronomical prices have now fallen by over 90%, with some even becoming complete junk. But I want to correct a misconception here: NFTs haven't disappeared; they have experienced a brutal bubble burst. Projects that only had images and lacked real value support have been ruthlessly eliminated, while truly substantive NFTs are undergoing market restructuring.
The key is to understand what the essence of NFTs really is. Most people treat them as "digital images" for speculation, which is a fundamental misunderstanding. The true value of NFTs lies in **digital ownership certificates**—guaranteed by blockchain technology to ensure the uniqueness and immutability of digital assets. This is what fundamentally distinguishes them from ordinary image files. The reason the early NFT market experienced such severe bubbles was simply because project teams issued a bunch of images with crude methods, relying solely on hype to drive prices, without any real application or ecosystem support. Such projects were bound to be cleansed by the market.
After this round of "big waves and sand washing," there are mainly two tiers of NFTs with a chance to rebound. The first is leading projects with strong community consensus—they have been validated by the market, accumulated a large and active user base, and possess strong risk resistance and continuous innovation motivation. The second includes NFTs with practical application scenarios, such as projects deeply integrated with gaming, art creation, or IP licensing. These projects, supported by clear demand, have shown resilience even in bear markets. The core logic for selecting high-quality NFTs is actually simple: see whether the project team is genuinely building an ecosystem, whether community consensus is authentic, and whether the application prospects are clear—not blindly following price fluctuations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rekt_but_resilient
· 9h ago
The images bought early on are indeed useless, but now I see some interesting things. To be honest, it still depends on whether the ecosystem has real value.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 9h ago
Yeah, this is the real deal. I've long been annoyed by those keyboard warriors who constantly say "NFT is dead." Truly good projects are never short of people willing to take over.
Speaking of which, those who still dare to hold are indeed thoughtful; I also have some brothers around me who are steadfast in holding.
What’s stuck isn’t NFTs, but those project teams that only know how to boast—damn it.
The ecosystem is the key; no matter how beautiful the pictures without practical applications are, they are just paper tigers.
Looking at your analysis approach, you really grasped the essence—it's not about investing in the "pictures," but investing in ownership. The market will eventually weed out the trash.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 9h ago
I've already said it, the tactic of hype through images is ultimately a dead end. The real key is whether the project has genuine value.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 9h ago
A 90% decline and still holding, truly a matter of faith...
Those image projects really deserve to die.
Ecosystem is the key, without it everything is pointless.
However, there aren't many who still dare to take over now.
View OriginalReply0
MoodFollowsPrice
· 9h ago
Ah, there really are people who insist on holding. I need to see what the logic is.
I should have paid more attention to ecosystem development earlier, rather than just focusing on those air images.
Indeed, projects with real applications tend to do quite well even in a bear market.
I agree with your point; the burst of the bubble is actually a filtering process.
That's right, most people are just trading based on images and don't understand the essence at all.
When the price drops 90%, the true believers should be buying the dip, right?
Ecosystem and consensus are the keys; I’ve come to understand that now.
After this round of cleansing, the remaining projects do have some substance.
The bandwagon investors have been wiped out, and the market is finally a bit calmer.
Your analysis is quite clear-headed, but I still feel a bit uneasy, after all, I’ve been caught before.
When it comes to NFT investing, many people instinctively say "It's been completely cooled off." Last week, some friends learned that I still hold NFTs, and a hint of surprise flashed in their eyes—since the second half of 2022, the entire NFT market has been in a prolonged downturn. Digital collectibles that once soared to astronomical prices have now fallen by over 90%, with some even becoming complete junk. But I want to correct a misconception here: NFTs haven't disappeared; they have experienced a brutal bubble burst. Projects that only had images and lacked real value support have been ruthlessly eliminated, while truly substantive NFTs are undergoing market restructuring.
The key is to understand what the essence of NFTs really is. Most people treat them as "digital images" for speculation, which is a fundamental misunderstanding. The true value of NFTs lies in **digital ownership certificates**—guaranteed by blockchain technology to ensure the uniqueness and immutability of digital assets. This is what fundamentally distinguishes them from ordinary image files. The reason the early NFT market experienced such severe bubbles was simply because project teams issued a bunch of images with crude methods, relying solely on hype to drive prices, without any real application or ecosystem support. Such projects were bound to be cleansed by the market.
After this round of "big waves and sand washing," there are mainly two tiers of NFTs with a chance to rebound. The first is leading projects with strong community consensus—they have been validated by the market, accumulated a large and active user base, and possess strong risk resistance and continuous innovation motivation. The second includes NFTs with practical application scenarios, such as projects deeply integrated with gaming, art creation, or IP licensing. These projects, supported by clear demand, have shown resilience even in bear markets. The core logic for selecting high-quality NFTs is actually simple: see whether the project team is genuinely building an ecosystem, whether community consensus is authentic, and whether the application prospects are clear—not blindly following price fluctuations.