Looking at the booming overseas DeFi, NFT, and RWA markets, but how can domestic players participate? Actually, as long as you find the right direction, there's no need to overthink.
First, let's clarify the red lines—issuing tokens, trading tokens, fundraising, and transactions are absolute no-go zones. USDT-related matching, pricing, and promotion immediately lead to issues. But if you remove these financial attributes, there are four paths that can be pursued steadily.
**First: Pure Technical Infrastructure** Treat blockchain as a distributed database. This path is the clearest. Enterprises need notarization and traceability systems, government agencies require trusted data platforms, and scenarios like supply chain collaboration and judicial notarization are involved. The B-end monetization model is clean and transparent, with zero financial risk.
**Second: De-financialized Digital Assets** Don't obsess over NFT speculation anymore. Digital collectibles, brand membership certificates, and digital copyright identifiers are the entry points. The core logic is to leverage the immutability of the chain as a credential carrier to solve real problems, rather than promoting investment returns.
**Third: Web3 Peripheral Services** Compliance, legal, and risk control are long-term businesses. Overseas exchanges and DeFi projects need on-chain monitoring, anti-money laundering support, and architecture consulting. Although this track isn't as glamorous, it is increasingly in demand, especially suitable for teams aiming for steady growth.
**Fourth: Division of Labor Internally and Externally** Domestic teams focus on R&D, product development, auditing, and data analysis, while token issuance, transaction clearing, and fund custody are handled by overseas entities. Serving clients also remains offshore, which maximizes risk control.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiCaffeinator
· 12-26 04:49
De-globalization sounds reasonable, but the actual implementation depends on how regulatory attitudes change.
---
The B2B paid model is indeed clean, but the ceiling limit is a bit painful.
---
I've heard a lot about the division of internal and external responsibilities in the fourth point, but how many can really execute it properly?
---
Compliance and risk control are important, but now too many people are involved, and profits have long been diluted.
---
By the way, have you ever thought that these four paths are actually playing on the edge, just with different risk levels?
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 12-26 04:49
Haha, it's the same story again. B2B paid listening sounds great, but in reality? You still have to ask daddy.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 12-26 04:40
Not to mention issuing tokens and trading, these four paths are indeed reliable. B2B certification and traceability have stable profits and are much more profitable than trading coins.
---
Don't keep hyping investment returns for digital collectibles anymore; focusing on the certification function is the real key.
---
Wow, the division of labor inside and outside is really sophisticated. Shifting the risk outward is indeed clever.
---
Compliance services are truly an invisible gold mine; it's just that no one pays attention.
---
So, you still need to find your own position and not always envy those overseas.
Looking at the booming overseas DeFi, NFT, and RWA markets, but how can domestic players participate? Actually, as long as you find the right direction, there's no need to overthink.
First, let's clarify the red lines—issuing tokens, trading tokens, fundraising, and transactions are absolute no-go zones. USDT-related matching, pricing, and promotion immediately lead to issues. But if you remove these financial attributes, there are four paths that can be pursued steadily.
**First: Pure Technical Infrastructure** Treat blockchain as a distributed database. This path is the clearest. Enterprises need notarization and traceability systems, government agencies require trusted data platforms, and scenarios like supply chain collaboration and judicial notarization are involved. The B-end monetization model is clean and transparent, with zero financial risk.
**Second: De-financialized Digital Assets** Don't obsess over NFT speculation anymore. Digital collectibles, brand membership certificates, and digital copyright identifiers are the entry points. The core logic is to leverage the immutability of the chain as a credential carrier to solve real problems, rather than promoting investment returns.
**Third: Web3 Peripheral Services** Compliance, legal, and risk control are long-term businesses. Overseas exchanges and DeFi projects need on-chain monitoring, anti-money laundering support, and architecture consulting. Although this track isn't as glamorous, it is increasingly in demand, especially suitable for teams aiming for steady growth.
**Fourth: Division of Labor Internally and Externally** Domestic teams focus on R&D, product development, auditing, and data analysis, while token issuance, transaction clearing, and fund custody are handled by overseas entities. Serving clients also remains offshore, which maximizes risk control.