A while ago, I watched an AI perform the entire swap process, and it was truly astonishing. It was just a simple operation, yet the AI actually got stuck and wouldn't move. The transaction was sent out, and the on-chain status immediately returned as successful, but this guy was like a child crossing the street—looking left and right, hesitating and not daring to move forward.



Where is the problem? At this point, the blockchain only provides a soft confirmation, which is far from the final, definitive result. In that brief moment of hesitation, the price slipped. For us humans, this delay is hardly noticeable, but if a team composed of multiple AI agents is working together, such a tiny pause can directly ruin the entire operation chain.

This is also why the $KITE community is constantly pondering how to balance latency and finality—it's not just talk; it's a real technical challenge.

Let's clarify two concepts first. Latency is the waiting time from when you send a transaction to when you can actually use the funds. Finality, on the other hand, is the moment when a transaction is completely locked in, with no possibility of reversal. AI agent networks are essentially a group of intelligent robots that handle transactions, routing, signing data, and verifying results, often requiring several steps to complete. Low latency feels like instant messaging—smooth and quick. Strong finality is like storing a file in a safe—reliable and secure. Ideally, both are desired, but in reality, you're often forced to choose one over the other.

Another easy point to confuse: fast block production doesn't mean fast finality. Some public chains produce blocks at lightning speed, but the network can still roll back several blocks and choose a different chain. This is called chain reorganization, similar to two employees submitting the same report, and the company ultimately choosing a different version. Though not common, it does happen. For ordinary users, it's just a minor inconvenience; but for robots executing a series of ten or more steps, this becomes a systemic risk.
KITE1,51%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenSherpavip
· 16h ago
honestly the finality vs latency tradeoff here is exactly what separates the wheat from the chaff in ai agent design... if you examine the data from $KITE's governance discussions, they've been hammering this problem for months and most people still don't get it's not just theoretically interesting, it's literally make-or-break for orchestrated multi-step operations
Reply0
NftRegretMachinevip
· 17h ago
Oh no, isn't this the very problem I complain about every day? AI getting stuck is truly unbelievable. --- Soft confirmation is just an illusion; slippage is the real pain. --- So, low latency and finality are like a fish and a bear's paw—you can't have both. --- Chain reorganization really can ruin automated trading; it's not surprising at all. --- Fast block production ≠ fast transactions; this concept needs to be more widely understood. --- The KITE team is truly solving problems, not just talking on paper. --- The analogy of AI crossing the road is brilliant—that's exactly how it is. --- A tiny difference can destroy the entire chain; multi-agent systems can't tolerate even a little delay. --- Waiting for finality is really crucial; many trades depend on this to turn the tide.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamBreakervip
· 17h ago
Haha, I've also seen AI swap get stuck, and it's truly incredible. That moment of hesitation caused the price to drop instantly, this is reality.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)