Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
I recently came across an in-depth reflection on the development direction of AI, where the author candidly pointed out a painful phenomenon: most of us are using AI in a way similar to pushing an old-fashioned watermill with nuclear power.
It sounds a bit exaggerated, but upon reflection, it actually makes sense. The current forms of AI products—search boxes, chat windows, text generation—appear powerful, but essentially they are still reusing the same old interaction logic. What should true innovation look like?
We need to think outside the existing framework: the ultimate form of AI should not just be faster and smarter search tools, but a completely new paradigm that redefines how people think, create, and collaborate.
From blockchain and Web3 to AI, each wave of technological advancement faces the same challenge—how to upgrade from "applying old tools" to "creating new possibilities." This transition may be more profound than we imagine.
Isn’t the Web3 scene the same? In the end, it’s still the old capital pool logic wrapped in a new skin. True disruption has never been just slapping an AI label on something.
That’s an interesting point, but by the time the ultimate form appears, most people will probably have already been through a round of being exploited.
Honestly, current AI products are like early crypto hype—able to tell stories, but no one really knows how to use them.
Framework shift? Wake up, buddy. Most project teams are thinking about how to more quickly harvest retail investors, not how to create new possibilities.
It’s an eternal cycle. Every wave of technological innovation comes with hype, but in the end, it’s the same old tricks. It’s just tiresome to watch.
I agree. The current AI interaction logic is still antique-level; it’s just wrapped up in more fancy packaging.
The same goes for the Web3 wave—many people are still using Web2 thinking, no wonder it's all just superficial innovation.
How long will it take for a true paradigm shift? Or is it something we simply can't imagine what it would look like?
---
Really, today's AI products are just shell games; their interaction logic is no different from 20 years ago.
---
The Web3 wave is the same; many people are just dressing old models in "application innovation" skins, it's hilarious.
---
Wait, if AI can truly redefine collaboration methods, wouldn't the DeFi ecosystem be completely transformed?
---
It's painful to admit, but how long do we have to wait for a real paradigm shift? Another ten years perhaps?
---
So essentially, everyone is just burning money to stack performance; no one has really thought about how to make good use of these things.
---
This argument sounds great, but every tech cycle someone shouts about a "brand new paradigm," and then what happens?
---
Maybe the problem is that users themselves don't want such radical change; the comfortable old routines are still the most practical.
We've seen a similar situation in Web3 before—many projects wrapped in blockchain just still playing the centralized game. Is AI heading down the same path now?
No one can say exactly what a real breakthrough should look like, but it definitely won't be something like an upgraded ChatGPT search box.
That's probably the biggest bottleneck, not the technology itself.
Honestly, it's just surface-level changes; I never thought user interaction could truly be revolutionary.
It was the same during the Web3 era—many people still used Web2 mindset to play with new technology, and you know how that ended.
In my opinion, the breakthrough might not be in AI itself, but in whether we dare to completely overthrow existing interaction assumptions.
Why does it feel like the wave of technology is stuck here...
In the end, we still have to return to human needs itself, not just for the sake of innovation.
But seriously, this realization has awakened many people, right?
By the way, is it possible that this is just a transitional phase?
Let's wait and see.
But breaking the deadlock is no easy feat. The Web3 hype has been overblown, and what do we have in the end? Still the same old bottle with a new label.
For AI to achieve a paradigm breakthrough? Someone has to dare to truly abandon the old logic first.
I agree with this idea, but the question is, who will be the first to take the plunge?
Anyway, this cycle is destined to either bring innovation or just keep the competition going. It all depends on what the next step will be.
Web3 has been the same over the past few years—many projects are just putting Web2 stuff on the blockchain... the true paradigm shift is still far away.
We've also gone through that wave in Web3, it's all the same routine—packaging new concepts to sell old stuff.
The real breakthrough might not have appeared yet, or maybe it has, but we haven't recognized it.
It feels a bit hopeless, but maybe this is just the darkness before dawn.
The idea is right, but we're really at that stage now, there's nothing we can do
The same goes for Web3; technology surpasses traditional methods, but we haven't found a killer app yet
Let's wait and see, a paradigm shift won't happen that quickly