Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Regarding the trend of Bitcoin, a well-known cryptocurrency commentator recently put forward a sharp argument.
His logic is as follows: if Bitcoin does not rise along with tech stocks during their surge, and also remains unmoved when precious metals (gold, silver) increase, then when will it actually go up? The answer seems quite harsh — probably never.
He further claims that Bitcoin's trading cycle has been completed. Participants who entered early have basically exited, and the remaining situation is very clear — if it doesn't rise, it can only fall.
Of course, this view has sparked widespread discussion in the market. Although such pessimistic statements are not new, they touch on a question many investors are contemplating: in the context of mainstream assets and risk assets both strengthening, what does Bitcoin's relative performance really signify?
Never? Fine, let's wait and see.
Why is this guy still using the outdated narrative of "early participants have exited"?
Tech stocks and gold have both risen, but BTC is still sitting here, what does that mean... actually, it means nothing.
Every cycle someone says it's over, but what’s the result?
Analyzing without looking at fundamentals and only focusing on short-term relative performance is really exhausting.
Anyway, I hold my position—either wait for a reversal or wait for zero, those are the only two outcomes.
This kind of argument is the most dangerous because it makes people miss the next wave.
Is the cycle complete or is it an accumulation phase? Time will tell.
---
Tech stocks rise, gold rises, coins stay still—just dead? That logic is a bit of a stretch, brother
---
Finished the cycle early and exited... this kind of rhetoric sounds like you're advising people to buy the dip
---
Always say it will never rebound, and what’s the result? Getting proven wrong is free
---
Mainstream assets are strengthening, but Bitcoin hasn't followed—it's a bit awkward
---
I've heard this tune for five years, really time to come up with a new joke
---
If it drops, it drops—anyway, I don't plan to sell this year
---
Always saying "never" is the most easily proven wrong statement
---
Never going to rise? Then why are people still accumulating? I’ve heard this argument too many times.
---
Cycle completed? Got out early? So what are the people still playing now doing? Think about it.
---
Is that all? How many times has Bitcoin been declared dead? Is one more time really a big deal?
---
I only care about the current greed index; everything else is nonsense.
---
And the key is who is saying this. If it’s him with a short position, then it’s even more hilarious.
---
Bitcoin didn’t rise with tech stocks and now says it will never rise? That logic is as ridiculous as a gambler’s conclusion.
---
Look at history and you’ll see, every time they say it’s over, but what’s the result?
If it doesn't go up, it can only go down. This logic applies to anyone, haha.
Never going to rise? Well, let's talk about this again next year.
---
Starting to talk down again, let's wait and see, history will tell.
---
Exited early? I think you haven't checked your wallet on the chain.
---
I'm tired of this prophecy talk; might as well discuss how to buy the dip.
---
Laughing to death, they didn't keep up with tech stocks but still want to blame Bitcoin, interesting.
---
Really? Are these coins just illusions then?
---
People have been saying the cycle is complete for years. When will it actually be over?
It's that time of year again with the "Bitcoin will never go up" rhetoric. I'm tired of hearing it.
Cycle completed? Exited early? Bro, how do you know the next round hasn't just begun?
Never? Brother, that's a bit too confident. I've seen the market slap down those kinds of claims many times.
Honestly, Bitcoin's relatively poor performance isn't just a recent thing, but the "never" argument is definitely an overstatement.
This guy is a typical hindsight analyst, already out of the game but still here bearish.
Cycle completed, retail investors all out... Just listen, don’t take it seriously.
Why isn’t it going up? I want to ask him, who is accumulating heavily in this round?
It’s always like this, the more they say it won’t work, the more people come in. That’s a game of strategy.
Never? They said the same last year, and now?
They are truly living in the narrative of the past.
Never going to rise? Bro, why don't you look at the historical trend? How many times has this "eternal bear market" happened?
Tech stocks are rising, gold is rising, but BTC is stagnant, which means the timing isn't right yet. Are you accumulating? Do you understand?
Really speechless. Every time the market consolidates, someone jumps out to be a naysayer.
Cycle completed? Early exit? If you cut your losses, don't blame the coin for not meeting your expectations.
---
Never going up? Just watch then. Anyway, I don't rely on these people's predictions.
---
Tech stocks and gold have both risen, but Bitcoin is still sluggish. It’s a bit awkward... But if you say it will never rise, that’s a huge gamble.
---
People say the cycle is complete and early exits happen... Someone says this every year, just laugh it off.
---
If it doesn’t rise, it will fall? Such simple logic doesn’t even need analysis. Might as well just flip a coin.
---
When mainstream assets are strong, BTC stays still. What does this tell us? It’s really worth thinking about.
---
Another influencer is spreading anxiety again, maximizing topic engagement but what about the logic? Who are they fooling?