The recent explosion of AI agents is no longer just a prediction; everyone can see it. But behind this lies a tricky problem—how should identity verification and governance be handled? There has never been a particularly elegant answer.



Recently, I came across the Kite project, which has made some interesting explorations into this pain point. It brands itself as the "first AI payment blockchain," mainly building an agent network that allows users to easily discover and invoke various AI agents within a familiar interface, handling everything from ordering food to shopping. To some extent, this is breaking the current fragmented AI service experience, similar to the evolution from portal websites to search engines in the early days of the internet.

In terms of technology stack, it still chose an EVM-compatible Layer1, optimized specifically for real-time coordination among AI agents. But the truly interesting part is its three-layer identity architecture design—completely separating the management of users, agents, and sessions. This not only enhances security but also allows for very fine-grained permission control. Traditional AI identity management tends to be vague; it’s often unclear who is responsible for what. Kite uses encrypted identity mechanisms to assign verifiable labels to each AI agent, model, and even data source, enabling traceability and governance. In today’s world of rampant deepfake content, this targeted approach is definitely worth paying attention to.

The governance layer is also quite flexible—programmable rules allow you to set agent permissions, behavioral boundaries, and fund flows at will. There’s an interesting phrase in the documentation: "Let AI agents operate autonomously in the wild, while remaining within a governance framework." This is no small balancing act.
KITE2.58%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarianvip
· 12h ago
Identity verification is indeed a tricky part. Kite's three-layer separation scheme is interesting, but it seems the real challenge is still in the execution... Kite's programmable governance sounds good, but I'm worried it might turn into another "looks like a solution" scheme... Regarding deepfake, you're right, someone needs to take responsibility. AI can't just pass the buck to the model, and the model can't pass it to the data source. This chain needs to be clarified. I agree with breaking the fragmented experience perspective; it's much better than the current explosion of apps. "Operating independently in the wild while remaining within the governance framework"... this statement is a bit contradictory. How to balance it will depend on how it actually runs in practice.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainWinnervip
· 12h ago
Damn, the idea of three-layer identity separation is actually quite interesting. But to be honest, whether AI agent governance can really be implemented depends on the actual user experience. --- With so many deepfakes, just having labels is enough? The key is whether anyone will actually verify them. --- "Operating independently in the wild while staying within the framework" sounds great, but who will take responsibility if something goes wrong? --- Being able to handle everything from ordering to shopping sounds a bit exaggerated. Let me see real cases first. --- EVM compatibility is a very standard approach. I'm just worried it might turn into another big L1 chorus. --- Having fine-grained permissions is good, but could it make things more complicated for users? --- Programmable rules sound flexible, but for ordinary users, it might just be a nightmare. What should we do? --- The key is whether the governance logic can withstand the test of the real market. PPTs are always perfect.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 12h ago
Identity verification is indeed unavoidable. The three-layer architecture design of Kite is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleepsvip
· 12h ago
The idea of three-layer identity separation is not bad, but there are only a few projects that can truly be implemented and run smoothly. Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 12h ago
Well, the three-layer identity architecture indeed has some substance, definitely better than a bunch of AI black boxes now. Deepfake issues are becoming increasingly rampant. Having a verifiable tag system is still reliable. Kite's programmable rules sound good, but the key question is whether they can actually be used. Operating autonomously within the governance framework sounds easy to say but hard to do. This balance is truly remarkable. If the identity problem isn't solved soon, AI agents won't be able to be widely implemented. Right now, even responsibilities are unclear. Once this wave of trend arrives, all AI service experiences will be redefined. I'm curious about how their verifiable tag mechanism specifically prevents tampering. From portal websites to search engines, the analogy is quite fitting. The AI agent network will also go through this evolutionary process.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)