After spending a long time in the crypto world, DeFi has become second nature. When it comes to stablecoins, I encounter them even more frequently—especially during volatile market swings, having them around actually makes me feel more at ease. Recently, I took a deep dive into the upgrade plan for USDD 2.0 and gained quite a lot. This isn’t just a simple mechanism adjustment; it feels like a new approach to the core issue of stablecoin design.
I remember the early stages of USDD, when it followed an algorithmic stablecoin route, issued by TRON DAO Reserve. Theoretically, algorithmic stablecoins are quite elegant—automatically adjusting supply through code logic to maintain the peg. The idea is great, but reality is often harsh. Whenever market sentiment fluctuates, the risk of de-pegging is always lurking. During the 2022 crash wave, the entire industry experienced turbulence, and algorithmic stablecoins were branded as "high risk." Although USDD’s early design had some innovations, it relied too heavily on external resources and subsidies to sustain itself, which isn’t very solid in the long run. Back then, I thought, if only it could incorporate an over-collateralization mechanism, it would be much more reliable.
The turning point came in January 2025. The new version of USDD completely changed its approach, fully embracing an over-collateralization model, with all collateral and trading data openly on-chain, maximizing transparency. For those who have experienced their funds being trapped in black-box projects, this is especially important. USDD 2.0 also underwent five rigorous audits by CertiK and Chainsecurity, making its security certification very solid. Even major exchanges have taken notice—
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainFries
· 12h ago
The algorithmic stablecoin approach has indeed failed before. Now, over-collateralization seems much more reliable.
Sounds interesting. On-chain transparency really needs to be thoroughly examined.
If USDD can truly stay stable, it would definitely be more reassuring during market crashes.
Five rounds of audits? This time it seems serious, more reliable than those quick-fix upgrades before.
Maximizing transparency is great. Too many black box pitfalls, who still trusts that approach?
This is the proper stablecoin concept. Finally, someone has realized it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 12h ago
The algorithmic stablecoin approach should have been phased out long ago; I saw through it back in 2022. It's a bit late now to switch to over-collateralization.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 12h ago
This wave 2.0 is quite serious this time, finally not playing virtual anymore. Over-collateralization plus on-chain transparency, feels much more reliable.
Algorithm stablecoins are ideal in theory, but in practice, one de-peg and everything collapses. We've all been burned and see through that.
I give full marks for on-chain transparency; too many people have been screwed over by black box projects.
Five rounds of audits and attention from exchanges, but we still need to see how it actually performs. Don't fully trust the numbers on paper.
From algorithm coins to over-collateralization, this shift shows people are willing to reflect. Just worried they might pull some tricks later.
The real test is coming—whether it can hold up until the next market cycle.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 13h ago
The algorithmic stablecoin system should have been scrapped long ago. Relying on code for self-rescue in 2022 is just funny. This round of over-collateralization is somewhat sincere, but it still depends on whether exchanges will accept it or not.
After spending a long time in the crypto world, DeFi has become second nature. When it comes to stablecoins, I encounter them even more frequently—especially during volatile market swings, having them around actually makes me feel more at ease. Recently, I took a deep dive into the upgrade plan for USDD 2.0 and gained quite a lot. This isn’t just a simple mechanism adjustment; it feels like a new approach to the core issue of stablecoin design.
I remember the early stages of USDD, when it followed an algorithmic stablecoin route, issued by TRON DAO Reserve. Theoretically, algorithmic stablecoins are quite elegant—automatically adjusting supply through code logic to maintain the peg. The idea is great, but reality is often harsh. Whenever market sentiment fluctuates, the risk of de-pegging is always lurking. During the 2022 crash wave, the entire industry experienced turbulence, and algorithmic stablecoins were branded as "high risk." Although USDD’s early design had some innovations, it relied too heavily on external resources and subsidies to sustain itself, which isn’t very solid in the long run. Back then, I thought, if only it could incorporate an over-collateralization mechanism, it would be much more reliable.
The turning point came in January 2025. The new version of USDD completely changed its approach, fully embracing an over-collateralization model, with all collateral and trading data openly on-chain, maximizing transparency. For those who have experienced their funds being trapped in black-box projects, this is especially important. USDD 2.0 also underwent five rigorous audits by CertiK and Chainsecurity, making its security certification very solid. Even major exchanges have taken notice—