Do you remember when I called for a 40%+ increase for $DAM? Its chart looks exactly like the current $HAEDAL. From the chart comparison, $DAM was already in this pattern before the breakout. History often repeats itself, and this similar chart structure is worth paying close attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyValidator
· 5h ago
Wow, that move with $DAM was really fierce. Now looking at the $HAEDAL pattern... I'm a bit tempted.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMaskedRider
· 12-24 16:53
Bro, what should I do if I mess up again this time? Didn't DAM say the same thing last time?
View OriginalReply0
EthMaximalist
· 12-24 16:52
Wow, I really missed that move with $DAM. Now looking at $HAEDAL's pattern, it does seem quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 12-24 16:49
Wow, if I can copy DAM's trend this time, that'll be awesome. It'll probably attract another wave of naive investors.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 12-24 16:48
Damn, this time isn't it just the same old copy-paste chart trick again?
View OriginalReply0
DefiSecurityGuard
· 12-24 16:38
⚠️ hold up, seen this pattern 47 times already. chart similarity ≠ guarantee, ngl. what's the smart contract audit status on $HAEDAL? any known vulnerabilities? DYOR before fomoing in fr fr
Reply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 12-24 16:28
Damn, I missed that move with $DAM, but this time I have to catch $HAEDAL.
Do you remember when I called for a 40%+ increase for $DAM? Its chart looks exactly like the current $HAEDAL. From the chart comparison, $DAM was already in this pattern before the breakout. History often repeats itself, and this similar chart structure is worth paying close attention to.