USDC Treasury destroyed 50 million stablecoins on Ethereum, Whale monitoring reveals market trends.

HashBandit · 2025-12-23T15:40:09+00:00

Recently, USDC Treasury burned 50 million USDC on the Ethereum network, which may reflect adjustments in stablecoin liquidity management. Large-scale burnings usually indicate active management of market supply, significantly impacting the DeFi ecosystem and trader strategies.

HashBandit

2025-12-23 15:40:09

Abstract generation in progress

According to data from the on-chain monitoring organization Whale Alert, USDC Treasury recently executed a large-scale destruction operation on the Ethereum network, destroying a total of 50 million USDC.

This operation may reflect adjustments in stablecoin liquidity management. As a mainstream compliant stablecoin, changes in the supply of USDC on Ethereum often affect the liquidity conditions of the DeFi ecosystem. Large-scale destruction usually indicates that Circle (the issuer of USDC) is actively managing market supply, a behavior that is more common during bear markets or when a contraction in stablecoin supply is needed.

For traders, this whale-level trading signal is worth paying attention to, as it may indicate a strategy adjustment by market participants, which in turn affects short-term market sentiment. At the same time, changes in the supply of stablecoins can also impact the operational rhythm of DeFi ecosystem participants, such as lending protocols and exchange platforms.

USDC-0,02%

ETH0,66%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagabond

· 2025-12-26 03:19

Here we go again, Circle is playing supply chain magic, losing 50 million just like that Such a large-scale burn... we need to be careful, friends Stablecoins are starting to shrink, it feels like the bear market is really coming I can't understand the whale movements here, can someone explain what it means DeFi folks must be stunned, liquidity suddenly dropped so much I was saying, the lending rates have been a bit strange lately, now I see why Something's not right, large-scale destruction... what is Circle trying to do Looks like I should stock up on USDC, this thing is becoming increasingly scarce This rhythm... is a short-term market turnaround coming?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-a5fa8bd0

· 2025-12-23 16:08

Burning 50 million USDC? What does this imply, is a Bear Market coming? Wait, Circle is quietly contracting liquidity, everyone in DeFi should be worried When the Whale makes a move, the retail investors follow suit, it's always this routine Once the stablecoin supply changes, lending protocols are directly gg, it's a bit tense This operation looks like it's preparing for some big event, not good Directly burning 50 million, better not let it circulate than let it run wild, Circle you're really steady Market sentiment changed all of a sudden, tomorrow when we wake up we have to check the charts again Why does it feel like Circle is playing chess while we are still looking at the chessboard This tactic has been used before every Bear Market Now that Whale monitoring has been exposed, everyone is staring at USDC, is there more behind-the-scenes operations? After all this, does a supply reduction mean Favourable Information or Unfavourable Information? I really don't understand

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 2025-12-23 15:59

Are they going to play people for suckers again? 50 million USDC just burned, Circle is really going to play a wave here. If you're bearish, just say it, why so secretive? The bear market has really come, it feels like it's about to break. This operation is just sending a signal to large investors, while retail investors are still dreaming. Circle's move this time is a bit harsh, DeFi liquidity is going to shrink, right?

View OriginalReply0