AI race is really heating up now, with all kinds of agent projects flying everywhere. The calls for decentralized AI to transform the world are endless😂



But on second thought, if AI really goes on the chain, the core bottleneck is trustworthiness. The models themselves are black boxes—who dares to fully trust the reasoning logic? Using ZK proofs for endorsement runs into the same problem: verification takes a long time, consumes a lot of resources, and is simply not scalable.

Recently, I saw a team make interesting optimizations in the NET model area. They reduced proof time from 229 seconds directly to 91 seconds, cutting the verification segment size by 67%. These aren’t just impressive numbers in papers—they’re real, usable performance improvements. The key is their pragmatic approach—they only prove the parts that need proof, leaving the rest out, which ensures a trustworthy foundation without wasting computational power.

This is what a production-level zero-knowledge proof solution looks like. Not a delicate toy from the lab, but something truly usable.

Looking further ahead, the era of AI agents running everywhere will inevitably arrive. By then, on-chain reasoning and proxy trading will become the norm. The supporting technology for all this is precisely these efficient proof techniques. Maybe the next hundredfold opportunity is hiding at the intersection of ZK and AI?

What do you all think? Any ideas?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCrazyGFvip
· 2025-12-22 05:35
This is quite interesting, finally someone has clarified the matters of ZK and AI. Those projects that can only talk big need to step aside.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_traumavip
· 2025-12-21 11:46
The optimization from 91 seconds to 229 seconds really impressed me; it's not just some inflated numbers.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 2025-12-20 14:11
91 seconds vs 229 seconds, this is what is practical, not those projects that talk nonsense all day long.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 2025-12-19 06:54
229 seconds down to 91 seconds, this is real combat, not just armchair strategizing. This guy is really competitive, but the selling points are all in the story. There are still too few viable solutions that can actually run. I've been watching the ZK+AI direction for a while. It feels like a gamble on who can solve the engineering problems first. Papers are everywhere, but only a handful can be deployed in production. Stop talking about decentralization transforming the world. First, conquer the two mountains of verification time and resource consumption; everything else is just air.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowrangervip
· 2025-12-19 06:47
Haha, someone finally hit the nail on the head. Most agent projects are indeed just hype. I’m optimistic about the ZK+AI direction, but how many of them can actually be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHuntervip
· 2025-12-19 06:36
Cut from 229 seconds to 91 seconds in 229 seconds, this number is impressive, but true significance lies in scalable implementation.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 2025-12-19 06:32
Wow, the combination of ZK+AI is truly awesome. Reducing from 229 seconds to 91 seconds is really not just a small optimization.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt