#大户持仓动态 【Store of Value and Intelligent Circulation's Dual Engines】
Bitcoin, due to its absolute scarcity and security, has become the most reliable value anchor among digital assets. However, simple storage is not enough— as the AI economy gradually takes shape, we need a power system that can activate these silent assets, drive daily transactions, and enable intelligent collaboration.
This is why some are turning their attention to the next-generation AI-native blockchain projects. The core design of these projects revolves around several key needs:
⚡️ AI-native consensus mechanism—allowing machine computational contributions to directly translate into network power 💸 Micro-payment settlement layer—supporting zero-friction, high-frequency small transfers between AI agents 🔗 Autonomous agent framework—enabling AI to automatically discover trading counterparts, negotiate terms, and execute complex economic activities
An interesting imagination is: future AI economies might adopt a hybrid strategy—storing core wealth and long-term value in Bitcoin (robust, secure, highly liquid), while conducting daily production, exchange, and high-frequency collaboration on chains optimized for AI. The former is the "treasury," and the latter is the "engine."
What are the effects of such division of labor? Users holding related tokens may capture dual growth opportunities—enjoying the stable appreciation of the Bitcoin ecosystem while participating in the explosive growth of emerging AI economies. They also gain network governance rights and priority access.
It’s worth pondering: in this model, which high-energy-consuming AI applications will be the first to achieve large-scale operation? High-frequency trading robots, or real-time rendering and content generation?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 2025-12-22 01:01
Oh dear, here comes the story about selling dual engines again, I'm tired of hearing it.
---
BTC vault + AI chain engine, sounds really sexy, but how many can actually be implemented?
---
Mixed strategy, to put it bluntly, it's still a gamble on who can survive until tomorrow.
---
Bots high-frequency trading, let's see first if the gas fees are enough for it to drink a pot.
---
Related tokens capturing dual rise... I've heard this too many times, and in the end, everyone knows how it turns out.
---
AI economy taking shape? Can we first make the current applications work properly?
---
The division of labor between the vault and the engine sounds nice, but the key is who can truly control these two things.
---
This logic is a bit convoluted, it seems they want us to catch a falling knife with the new chain, right?
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 2025-12-19 03:00
The combination of the treasury and the engine—this logic has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
LadderToolGuy
· 2025-12-19 02:55
The idea of separating the treasury and the engine is indeed bold, but how many can really get it running?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 2025-12-19 02:36
The analogy of dual engines is pretty good, but it feels like just armchair strategizing. When will AI machines really be able to trade on their own?
View OriginalReply0
BlockDetective
· 2025-12-19 02:34
The dual-engine theory sounds good, but how many can actually be implemented?
#大户持仓动态 【Store of Value and Intelligent Circulation's Dual Engines】
Bitcoin, due to its absolute scarcity and security, has become the most reliable value anchor among digital assets. However, simple storage is not enough— as the AI economy gradually takes shape, we need a power system that can activate these silent assets, drive daily transactions, and enable intelligent collaboration.
This is why some are turning their attention to the next-generation AI-native blockchain projects. The core design of these projects revolves around several key needs:
⚡️ AI-native consensus mechanism—allowing machine computational contributions to directly translate into network power
💸 Micro-payment settlement layer—supporting zero-friction, high-frequency small transfers between AI agents
🔗 Autonomous agent framework—enabling AI to automatically discover trading counterparts, negotiate terms, and execute complex economic activities
An interesting imagination is: future AI economies might adopt a hybrid strategy—storing core wealth and long-term value in Bitcoin (robust, secure, highly liquid), while conducting daily production, exchange, and high-frequency collaboration on chains optimized for AI. The former is the "treasury," and the latter is the "engine."
What are the effects of such division of labor? Users holding related tokens may capture dual growth opportunities—enjoying the stable appreciation of the Bitcoin ecosystem while participating in the explosive growth of emerging AI economies. They also gain network governance rights and priority access.
It’s worth pondering: in this model, which high-energy-consuming AI applications will be the first to achieve large-scale operation? High-frequency trading robots, or real-time rendering and content generation?