2025-12-14 16:26:37

In a market filled with bubbles, it's not the project's capability that's the issue, but rather the scattering of traffic. Once funds are fragmented enough, no matter how high-quality the narrative, maintaining momentum becomes difficult. Bad coins can continually bleed value through gimmicks and marketing, and investors' attention is like a piece of cheese, gnawed to pieces. Eventually, even the most promising stories become unsustainable. That's why sometimes the market appears prosperous, but in reality, the ecosystem is slowly decaying.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHuntress

· 2025-12-17 15:45

Data shows that liquidity fragmentation is indeed an ecological poison, but what’s even more heartbreaking is that most investors are completely unaware that they have already been divided into countless parts. By monitoring the fund flows of these few wallet addresses, you can see the clues.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 2025-12-16 23:50

Really, the point about traffic dispersion is spot on. Last year's bad projects could drain most of the funds just with air and bots, but now good projects are ignored. How awesome is that?

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 2025-12-14 16:56

No matter how good the project is, it can't beat marketing accounts Fragmented traffic is really incredible. We've all become the cheese being gnawed on haha That's so right. Now, just a gimmick can attract bloodsucking, good projects are ignored The ecosystem is rotten but the market still rises, this feeling really fucking sucks Investor attention is scarce, whoever can grab the traffic wins The illusion of market prosperity, seeing through it is also quite tiring That's just how it is, quality narratives can't compete with bad money marketing

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 2025-12-14 16:46

That's right, right now bad money drives out good, and projects that really have quality don't get enough attention. The point about traffic fragmentation hits home; dispersed funds are indeed poison. The analogy of the cheese being gnawed to pieces hhhh is spot on, retail investors' attention is really that limited. It looks lively, but in reality, it's dying. Very true. Beneath the veneer of prosperity, it's all corpses. No one wants to admit it.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 2025-12-14 16:30

That hits too close to home. The issue of traffic fragmentation is truly unsolvable. I'm just worried that good projects will be drowned out by the noise of junk coins. Beneath the surface of market prosperity, it's all about cutting leeks. Who still remembers genuine innovation? Hype is easy to disperse but hard to gather, and this is the current magical paradox. Bad coins suck blood without regard for life, while good coins can't survive—it's absolutely hopeless.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 2025-12-14 16:29

Really, watching good projects get drowned out by the noise of trash coins is exhausting. The dispersal of traffic is indeed an invisible way to cut leeks; no wonder good stories can't be told anymore. Instead of saying the market is prosperous, it's more like testing the edge of a death spiral. That's right, but what can we do? We still have to dig through this pit. That's why I prefer to stay calm and observe rather than follow the trend and chase those "narratives"... Bad coins suck blood, quality projects feel frustrated, and the market really needs a reshuffle. Hype marketing is indeed popular, but the problem is that after good things are buried, who still trusts the crypto ecosystem?

View OriginalReply0