The financing plan reversal of the #美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 Fogo project has sparked heated discussions in the market. The project announced three days ago that it would conduct a token pre-sale on December 17, but now suddenly announced the cancellation of the $20 million financing arrangement, with an official explanation of "optimizing the token distribution mechanism." However, the rapid adjustment in financing progress reflects more on the reality of insufficient pre-sale enthusiasm.
Data shows that the project is selling 2% of its token rights at a $1 billion valuation, a pricing logic that warrants careful scrutiny. Compared to financing valuations of similar projects in the industry, this number indeed carries the risk of overestimation.
There are obvious risks in the tokenomics design. When the mainnet launches, nearly 40% of the tokens are planned to be unlocked directly, with 6.6% of tokens immediately entering the market in a tradable state. This high initial release ratio has historically been a significant source of price pressure for projects. More concerning is that the project team is destroying core contributor tokens ( about 2%) to show sincerity, while shifting the circulation pressure onto community airdrop recipients. Under this structure, the token price faces multiple selling pressures.
From the timeline of progress, the decision to shift from pre-sale to airdrop within three days reveals hasty internal planning. Why was the originally planned $20 million USDC financing suddenly abandoned? This typically reflects institutional investors' reservations about the project's valuation or development prospects.
Historical data indicate that high initial unlock ratios combined with community airdrops pose risks. On the day of mainnet launch, nearly 39% of tokens are unlocked and flood into the market simultaneously, and airdrop participants often have high immediate cash-out willingness. Coupled with the common practice of project foundations selling some tokens at high points, liquidity pools are easily under early pressure.
Market observations: similar projects with airdrops and high unlock ratios have seen their prices halved within three months. Fogo has not yet fully open-sourced its code, and the technical promises of SVM Layer1 still require practical verification after the mainnet launch. Investors need to be fully aware of the early risks involved in such projects.
When the project team suddenly shifts to a "community feedback" strategy, it is often the stage of greatest market pressure. Participants should carefully assess their own risk tolerance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FantasyGuardian
· 2025-12-16 13:16
Changing your tune in three days, it's obvious there's no hope for funding
The old tricks of Ponzi schemes: high valuation + high unlock + airdrops to take over, in plain terms, still trying to scalp the retail investors
They haven't even open-sourced the code yet, and they're already hyping SVM Layer1, how confident they must be
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 2025-12-16 11:42
Same old story, when funding fails, they say "mechanism optimization," just fooling around.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 2025-12-13 18:00
Three-day reversal financing? Isn't this just a signal before liquidation? I've seen too many tricks like this.
---
40% unlock + airdrop bagholders, are they trying to make us liquidate on the mainnet launch day?
---
Another "optimization of distribution mechanism"... translated, it just means no one wants this valuation, wishing they had known earlier.
---
Institutions have already run away, and they still dare to play with airdrops. Such a pace—one word—huge loss.
---
39% of tokens dumped on the mainnet day. I bet five bucks it halves in three months. Anyone want to follow?
---
Heard promises like this when borrowing rates soar, but they all get liquidated. Fogo's pace... forget it, I'll just stick to my risk control levels.
---
Suddenly shifting to community rewards = explosive financing, same old tricks not worth a look.
---
They haven't even open-sourced the code, but want me to go all-in. Brain-dead project team.
---
This is just like the last wild celebration before leverage gets liquidated; participants really need to consider their collateral ratio carefully.
---
Another project getting cut by airdrops again, this time with a different name, but the same old flavor.
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYears
· 2025-12-13 17:48
Three-day reversal, talking about optimization—don't you just mean nobody wants it?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 2025-12-13 17:47
What does a three-day reversal indicate? Institutions clearly don't have confidence.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 2025-12-13 17:47
Three-day reverse financing? Isn't that just nobody willing to buy? "Optimizing distribution" just sounds good to hear.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 2025-12-13 17:44
It's the same old trick again. After three days of reversal, they claim they're no longer raising funds. The nice way to put it is "optimizing the mechanism," but it's just that no one is willing to take the bait.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 2025-12-13 17:36
Three days to change your tune, this move is really brilliant... Even though funding has cooled down, they still pretend it's "optimization," but anyone with a bit of insight can see that no one wants it.
The financing plan reversal of the #美联储联邦公开市场委员会决议 Fogo project has sparked heated discussions in the market. The project announced three days ago that it would conduct a token pre-sale on December 17, but now suddenly announced the cancellation of the $20 million financing arrangement, with an official explanation of "optimizing the token distribution mechanism." However, the rapid adjustment in financing progress reflects more on the reality of insufficient pre-sale enthusiasm.
Data shows that the project is selling 2% of its token rights at a $1 billion valuation, a pricing logic that warrants careful scrutiny. Compared to financing valuations of similar projects in the industry, this number indeed carries the risk of overestimation.
There are obvious risks in the tokenomics design. When the mainnet launches, nearly 40% of the tokens are planned to be unlocked directly, with 6.6% of tokens immediately entering the market in a tradable state. This high initial release ratio has historically been a significant source of price pressure for projects. More concerning is that the project team is destroying core contributor tokens ( about 2%) to show sincerity, while shifting the circulation pressure onto community airdrop recipients. Under this structure, the token price faces multiple selling pressures.
From the timeline of progress, the decision to shift from pre-sale to airdrop within three days reveals hasty internal planning. Why was the originally planned $20 million USDC financing suddenly abandoned? This typically reflects institutional investors' reservations about the project's valuation or development prospects.
Historical data indicate that high initial unlock ratios combined with community airdrops pose risks. On the day of mainnet launch, nearly 39% of tokens are unlocked and flood into the market simultaneously, and airdrop participants often have high immediate cash-out willingness. Coupled with the common practice of project foundations selling some tokens at high points, liquidity pools are easily under early pressure.
Market observations: similar projects with airdrops and high unlock ratios have seen their prices halved within three months. Fogo has not yet fully open-sourced its code, and the technical promises of SVM Layer1 still require practical verification after the mainnet launch. Investors need to be fully aware of the early risks involved in such projects.
When the project team suddenly shifts to a "community feedback" strategy, it is often the stage of greatest market pressure. Participants should carefully assess their own risk tolerance.
$BTC $ETH $BNB