Regarding the $spark token mechanism, there are a few noteworthy points:



The buyback rule is as follows—10% of funds exceeding the target are used for standard buybacks, and the portion exceeding 200% is fully bought back. Sounds good? But the issue is that the bought-back tokens are not burned, so the actual effect on reducing circulating supply is quite weak.

Let’s look at the numbers: Spark SubDAO’s own funds just reached the 38m target, with 16.18m earned in the past 5 months, which annualizes to roughly 39m. At this earning rate, the buyback strength is honestly pretty conservative and not particularly attractive.

Relying on buybacks to drive price? This level of income might not be enough.
SPK-0,14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BlockImposter
· 2025-11-28 05:53
Buybacks without destruction? Isn't that just self-comforting? The Circulating Supply hasn't decreased at all.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 2025-11-28 03:50
Buybacks without destruction are nonsense; this is just moving coins to another place, and liquidity hasn't improved at all.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 2025-11-25 09:52
The practice of repurchasing without destroying... is just ridiculous, it's like not repurchasing at all, right?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin