Mastercard's $1.8 Billion Bet on Stablecoins: Restructuring the Payment Track

Author: Ada, Deep Tide TechFlow

Link:

Disclaimer: This article is a reprint. Readers can find more information through the original link. If the author has any objections to the reprint, please contact us, and we will make modifications according to the author’s requirements. Reprints are for information sharing only and do not constitute any investment advice or represent Wu Shuo’s views and positions.

Mastercard’s Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert once said in an interview: “There’s really no problem that needs solving in the card business.”

Then he led a $1.8 billion acquisition of BVNK.

On March 17, Mastercard announced it would acquire London-based stablecoin infrastructure company BVNK for up to $1.8 billion, with $1.5 billion fixed and $300 million performance-based. This is the largest acquisition in the stablecoin field to date, surpassing Stripe’s $1.1 billion purchase of Bridge in 2024.

When someone says “there’s no problem,” yet spends $1.8 billion, the real meaning is clear: the problem has already arrived, and it’s too big to ignore.

A Knife at the Heart of Card Organizations

To understand this deal, first understand Mastercard’s revenue structure.

According to Raymond James analyst John Davis, about 37% of Mastercard’s revenue comes from cross-border transactions and international e-commerce. Visa’s share is similar, at 36%. Morningstar analyst Brett Horn directly states: “Cross-border payments are just a small part of the entire payments world, but they are a significant part of card organization revenue.” Mastercard’s adjusted operating profit margin for 2025 is close to 60%, with cross-border business being the main profit contributor.

Stablecoins are targeting this lucrative segment.

Traditional cross-border payments use SWIFT and correspondent banks, taking 3 to 5 days for settlement with fees of 3% to 6%. Stablecoin payments settle on-chain within minutes, with fees below 1%, and operate year-round. McKinsey data shows that by 2025, stablecoin card issuance will reach $4.5 billion, a 673% increase. These cards allow users to spend stablecoins directly at merchants accepting Visa or Mastercard, without converting to fiat first. Stablecoins are bypassing the card organizations’ settlement networks using their own acceptance infrastructure.

What truly worries card organizations isn’t today’s volume but the trend. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicts stablecoin supply will reach $3 trillion by 2030, with Citigroup’s bullish forecast at $4 trillion. Today’s volume is negligible, but in cross-border consumption and merchant settlement scenarios, the fees collected by card organizations and the costs of stablecoins differ by an order of magnitude. Once major platforms start accepting stablecoins for direct settlement, the fee model of card organizations will be dismantled.

Industry experts from Third Bridge point out a deeper threat: the biggest risk comes from merchant adoption. Platforms like Amazon, Walmart, and Shopify have strong incentives to replace card payments with low-cost stablecoin channels, redefining checkout economics.

Harvey Li, founder of Tokenization Insight, says: “The card network is the easiest payment pathway to be disrupted by stablecoins.”

Front-end cards, back-end blockchain

BVNK’s business is straightforward: bridging fiat and on-chain stablecoins for enterprises, covering cross-border transfers, B2B settlements, and remittances. Clients include Worldpay, Deel, Flywire, operating in 130 countries, with an annual transaction volume of $30 billion and annual revenue of $40 million, but not yet profitable.

Mastercard’s annual net profit is about $15 billion, with a profit margin of 45%. $1.8 billion is only 0.4% of its market value—barely pocket change. It’s not about the $40 million annual revenue, $30 billion transaction volume, or even BVNK’s technology.

On the day stablecoins become the main settlement layer, Mastercard won’t be on the sidelines.

Mastercard’s vision is clear: embed BVNK into its network to enable 24-hour stablecoin settlement, stablecoin checkout within payment gateways, and seamless conversion between fiat and digital assets. According to American Banker, after the acquisition, BVNK will be integrated into Mastercard’s network on three levels: providing stablecoin settlement for merchants and acquirers, adding stablecoin checkout in Mastercard’s payment gateway, and establishing channels for fiat conversion across cards, accounts, and wallets.

Raj Dhamodharan, Mastercard’s EVP of Blockchain and Digital Assets, explains this logic clearly: “We see stablecoins as a form of rail transportation. Each stablecoin can be viewed as a global ACH, with consumers unaware of the complexity.” Karen Webster, editor of PYMNTS, summarizes more directly: “Mastercard isn’t fighting stablecoins; it’s integrating them.”

Integration is key. Front-end remains a card, but back-end shifts to blockchain. Users won’t notice the change, but the underlying settlement infrastructure has been replaced.

However, the $1.8 billion is a ticket, not a finished product.

One of BVNK’s selling points is chain-agnosticism, capable of operating on Ethereum, Solana, Tron, and other chains. But each chain has different confirmation times, gas fee structures, and security models. Harmonizing these differences to meet Mastercard’s network standards is a significant engineering challenge. BVNK operates in 130 countries, each with different stablecoin regulations. The GENIUS Act only covers the U.S., Europe has MiCA, and Asian countries each have their own rules—compliance costs will be a continuous black hole. Harmse, co-founder of BVNK, told CNBC that the company is growing fastest in the U.S. This hints at the core issue: the maturity of stablecoin payment infrastructure heavily depends on local regulatory environments. Outside the U.S., conditions are far from ready.

Mastercard is buying a potentially powerful engine, but installing it into a 60-year-old vehicle isn’t something that can be completed just by signing the deal.

Regulatory Legitimacy: The Old Order’s License to Harvest

Mastercard isn’t the only player in the race.

Stripe spent $1.1 billion acquiring Bridge; Visa partnered with Bridge to promote stablecoin cards in over 100 countries; PayPal’s PYUSD circulation exceeds $1 billion; JPMorgan launched JPMD; Citigroup is considering issuing its own stablecoin. McKinsey and Artemis data project that by 2025, total stablecoin payments will reach about $390 billion, with 58% from B2B transactions. Cross-border vendor payments, global payroll, and trade settlements are shifting from SWIFT to stablecoin rails.

The driving logic behind these giants’ moves is simple: rather than waiting for stablecoin companies to grow and compete, it’s better to buy them now.

BVNK’s own history is a testament. In December 2024, it raised a Series B at a $750 million valuation, led by Haun Ventures, with Tiger Global and Coinbase Ventures participating. By October 2025, Coinbase entered exclusive negotiations with a bid around $2 billion. A month later, Coinbase withdrew for unknown reasons. Mastercard then stepped in, offering $1.5 billion fixed plus $300 million performance-based, $2 billion less than Coinbase’s bid.

This structure speaks volumes. The largest crypto-native trading platform exited at the last moment, and traditional finance acquired it at a lower price. Regardless of Coinbase’s reasons for withdrawing, the result is clear: stablecoin infrastructure is ultimately absorbed by the old order, not integrated into a new one.

There’s a bigger paradox here. The crypto industry spent a decade fighting for regulatory legitimacy. The GENIUS Act passed, providing a federal framework for stablecoins. Legitimization is good. But the biggest beneficiaries of legalization aren’t crypto-native companies; they’re old players like Mastercard, Stripe, and Visa—those with licenses, compliance teams, and distribution networks.

Regulatory legitimacy grants traditional finance a license to harvest.

Ryan Bozarth, founder of Dakota, says that after the acquisition of Bridge and BVNK, there are indeed opportunities for new payment companies to emerge. He’s right. But if history is any guide, the next generation of stablecoin startups will likely face the same fate: an acquisition offer.

Electronic transactions haven’t eliminated stock exchanges; the internet hasn’t replaced banks; stablecoins probably won’t eliminate card organizations either. But card organizations will transform into something entirely different—shifting from “card networks” to “multi-rail fund flow platforms.” This isn’t disruption; it’s absorption.

In the payments industry, the layer closest to users always takes the most money.

Mastercard is closest to users. The $1.8 billion it spent is just to ensure that nothing changes.