On February 21, Caixin published an article titled “Strict Regulation of Offshore RWA,” which pointed out that the notice issued by the People’s Bank of China and eight other departments on February 6 regarding further prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies (hereinafter referred to as Document No. 42) has the overall tone of “strict offshore regulation.” According to sources familiar with Chinese regulatory authorities, RWA based on assets in Hong Kong, China, are not within the scope of regulation under Document No. 42 and are not under the responsibility of domestic Chinese regulatory agencies. If domestic securities or funds serve as underlying assets and are issued as RWA offshore, then relevant departments of the China Securities Regulatory Commission are responsible. The relevant statements emphasize that strict regulation will be implemented for outbound RWA of domestic assets and should not be interpreted as a signal to encourage or relax regulation. Additionally, Caixin learned that during the weekend following the release of Document No. 42, a team from CICC Hong Kong had already been engaging with major public blockchains and exchanges to explore business cooperation opportunities. Some blockchain project leaders also expressed hope to collaborate with related investment banks and intermediary institutions to explore business opportunities. Ant Group and JD.com have also shown high concern regarding policy changes.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Caixin: RWA based on assets in Hong Kong, China are not under the jurisdiction of Chinese domestic regulators
On February 21, Caixin published an article titled “Strict Regulation of Offshore RWA,” which pointed out that the notice issued by the People’s Bank of China and eight other departments on February 6 regarding further prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies (hereinafter referred to as Document No. 42) has the overall tone of “strict offshore regulation.” According to sources familiar with Chinese regulatory authorities, RWA based on assets in Hong Kong, China, are not within the scope of regulation under Document No. 42 and are not under the responsibility of domestic Chinese regulatory agencies. If domestic securities or funds serve as underlying assets and are issued as RWA offshore, then relevant departments of the China Securities Regulatory Commission are responsible. The relevant statements emphasize that strict regulation will be implemented for outbound RWA of domestic assets and should not be interpreted as a signal to encourage or relax regulation. Additionally, Caixin learned that during the weekend following the release of Document No. 42, a team from CICC Hong Kong had already been engaging with major public blockchains and exchanges to explore business cooperation opportunities. Some blockchain project leaders also expressed hope to collaborate with related investment banks and intermediary institutions to explore business opportunities. Ant Group and JD.com have also shown high concern regarding policy changes.