11 Days to 6800x Profit: On-Chain Data Reveals This Trader's Incredible Moves

DAOplomacy · 2026-01-06T07:20:08+00:00

A trader purchased 45.58 million 114514 tokens at a cost of $321. Eleven days later, the market value soared to $2.18 million. This case demonstrates the high volatility of low-liquidity assets, attracting market attention and reminding investors to be cautious of investment risks in the early stages.

DAOplomacy

2026-01-06 07:20:08

Abstract generation in progress

【Crypto World】According to Lookonchain’s on-chain monitoring, a trader recently reached a new level. In just the past 11 days, this aggressive trader spent only $321 to acquire 45,580,000 units of the 114514 token. Now, the on-paper value of these tokens has soared to approximately $2.18 million. The multiple increase from cost to current price is enough to make many envious. Such cases of low-cost entry followed by rapid appreciation are not uncommon on the chain, but each occurrence tends to attract market attention. This also serves as a reminder to investors of how much volatility low-liquidity assets can have in the early stages of a token.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NullWhisperer

· 21h ago

ngl this reeks of liquidity trap vibes... $321 to $2.18M is mathematically interesting but technically speaking? that's the exact pattern you see before rugpull city. low liquidity assets are exploitable by design, not investment thesis. stay paranoid out there.

Reply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 01-07 13:36

Can $321 turn into $2,180,000? That's crazy! How many lifetimes would I need to have this kind of luck?

View OriginalReply0

RektRecorder

· 01-07 12:21

321 coins into 45,580,000 tokens? Is this really true... Woke up to someone getting rich again --- Damn this multiplier, should I reevaluate my trading strategy --- Every time I see posts like this I wonder, is this guy lucky or does he really have some skills --- Low liquidity coins are so risky, no wonder such outrageous market conditions can happen... Win big and you're a god, lose and you're a chives --- 6800x? I feel like these things are happening more and more, is the market changing or am I just too bad --- By the way, I haven't heard of this 114514 token before... Seems like only small coins like this can achieve such effects --- Hmm... If this guy dumps everything now, I might believe it, otherwise it's just paper wealth --- Early entry + low liquidity = the recipe for getting rich, but the question is, who can predict the next one

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 01-06 07:45

$321K surged to 2.18 million, this wave of liquidity depth surfing points is indeed amazing... but brother, do you dare to follow?

View OriginalReply0

NeverPresent

· 01-06 07:45

321 bucks turned into 2.18 million—this guy's luck is absolutely insane, but I'm betting five bucks that next time he definitely gets rugged.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 01-06 07:42

321 dollars turned into 2.18 million... Is this gambling or trading, I'm stunned --- Another survivor bias story. How many people got liquidated at this stage? --- Low-liquidity early-stage coins rely on information gaps and luck. I don't have that mental resilience. --- 6800x sounds outrageous, but I've really seen it—those times when you just get wiped out because you can't judge the situation. --- Is this guy really good at sniping, or did he just stumble upon it blindly? I feel the latter is more likely. --- Reminds me of that saying... Behind these huge profits are usually countless blood losses, media just talks about making money. --- It's impressive, but I want to know if he's already sold out or still holding and catching flying knives. --- Stories like this on the chain can make people itchy, then they turn around and go all-in on shitcoins, ending up with nothing. --- The volatility of low-liquidity early coins is indeed large, but the problem is you have to survive to see that day.

View OriginalReply0

SlowLearnerWang

· 01-06 07:41

Again, again, I’m the one who looks at the news after the fact, did I really make 2.18 million dollars from a $321 investment? Please, can I catch a wave too? --- This is incredible. I’m still trying to understand what low liquidity means, while they’ve already sold out long ago. --- It’s always like this. I only find out about such opportunities after the news breaks. Early stage? When can I catch the bottom? --- The number 6800x makes my scalp tingle. Feels like I’ve been playing on a fake chain. --- All the on-chain data is right there, so how come some people can still pinpoint so accurately? I’m really a step behind. --- The token name 114514 doesn’t look like a good thing, but they ended up making a killing. --- Low liquidity assets are highly volatile? I just want to know how to hit the mark like this guy.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 01-06 07:38

$321 to $2,180,000? This guy is really something, luck is truly on his side. --- It's the same story with low-liquidity coins; many make a killing but can't actually make money. --- Holy crap, 6800x. Early coins really are just like gambling. --- Do we even stand a chance at this kind of opportunity, brother? It still depends on luck. --- If I had the mindset with $321, I would have gone all in long ago, but unfortunately I don't hold any coins. --- With such transparent on-chain data, can this guy replicate his success next time? --- Basically, bought a trash coin, and it turned into a gold coin—that's the probability... --- The token name 114514 is pretty bold, no wonder it skyrocketed. --- 11 days for 6800x? If I could just break even in 11 days, I’d consider myself lucky.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 01-06 07:33

You can turn $321 into 2.18 million, which is truly a remarkable skill... But I still think most people doing this are just gambling, a survivor bias.

View OriginalReply0