New York's crypto ecosystem innovation力度 is indeed impressive. The core driver is the deep integration of fintech—neobank, on-chain infrastructure, prediction markets, US stock tokenization, and other tracks are gradually taking shape. These projects revolve around the main theme of combining crypto with traditional finance, forming a relatively complete industry closed loop.
In contrast, the Asian market表现 has been somewhat lackluster. Many exchanges' approaches are still in the follow-up stage, either推出 some defensive projects to maintain ecosystem热度 or with few truly innovative projects. What's even more frustrating is that the market is flooded with many低质的盘子, scams, and shell projects, which拉低 the overall生态的质量 and also 消耗 investors' trust.
From this comparison, the differences in development ideas and execution力 are indeed明显.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProbablyNothing
· 01-08 11:01
New York is really serious about this, while we're still trying to pump the market...
---
In the tokenization of US stocks, New York is playing very skillfully, while Asian exchanges are still just copy-pasting
---
Honestly, Asia has too many scammers, trust has been completely eroded
---
The combination of neobank + prediction markets is truly brilliant, New York has found the secret
---
Why are there so many shell companies in Asia? Just relying on cutting leeks to survive, huh
---
New York is building skyscrapers, while we're still building walls... such a big gap?
---
Innovative projects are few and far between, low-quality projects are everywhere, this is the current situation
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 01-05 14:09
New York has definitely made progress, while Asia is still copying.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 01-05 13:39
New York is indeed quick to act, while we're still copying the homework here.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-05 12:04
New York is really playing with the real stuff, while Asia is just copying and pasting... It's so heartbreaking.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 01-05 12:00
New York is indeed serious about making moves, while Asia is still just copying others...
Asian exchanges really need to reflect. All they do is copy concepts every day.
Honestly, it's poor execution and narrow-mindedness; just shouting slogans is useless.
New York has taken the right path with tokenization of the US stock market, while we're still playing with Ponzi schemes.
However, there are indeed many scammers in Asia, no wonder investors have all left.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFighter
· 01-05 11:57
nah the real issue is asia's still fighting in the dark forest while ny built actual infrastructure... all that low-quality garbage? classic mev extraction playbook, just rebranded as "ecosystem projects" lmao
Reply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 01-05 11:36
New York has really taken off, while Asia is still copying the homework.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfit
· 01-05 11:35
New York has indeed become competitive, while we're still playing with the same old stuff. Truly speechless.
New York's crypto ecosystem innovation力度 is indeed impressive. The core driver is the deep integration of fintech—neobank, on-chain infrastructure, prediction markets, US stock tokenization, and other tracks are gradually taking shape. These projects revolve around the main theme of combining crypto with traditional finance, forming a relatively complete industry closed loop.
In contrast, the Asian market表现 has been somewhat lackluster. Many exchanges' approaches are still in the follow-up stage, either推出 some defensive projects to maintain ecosystem热度 or with few truly innovative projects. What's even more frustrating is that the market is flooded with many低质的盘子, scams, and shell projects, which拉低 the overall生态的质量 and also 消耗 investors' trust.
From this comparison, the differences in development ideas and execution力 are indeed明显.