2026-01-03 07:24:12

Review of MARU project's performance: from an initial market cap of $2.3 million to a historical high of $4.1 million, a significant increase. The onboarding experience was quite smooth—launched on time, seamless purchase process, and sufficient trading depth, which is not common in many new projects.

Interestingly, 10% of the supply was distributed for free through airdrops, a quite generous setup. Many people missed out on this opportunity due to information gaps or lack of action, reflecting the always-present gap between perception and execution in the market. The project's approach—ensuring a smooth launch while providing community members with a sense of gain through airdrops—indeed helps build considerable buzz in the early stages.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleShadow

· 21h ago

Ha, it's that kind of "miss the airdrop and miss out on millions" story again. I was just wondering why some people always wake up too late. What are you pretending? Deep understanding is probably because the initial funds were small. Don't be fooled by a smooth launch. A 10% airdrop is indeed impressive, but the real test is still to come.

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 21h ago

Another story of a "smooth launch"... I've been through it too. The projects in 2018 also hyped themselves this way. A 10% airdrop? Haha, isn't that just a trick? Early on, they build up hype, and how things go later depends on the project team's mood. People who missed out actually dodged a bullet. Information gap? More like bad luck.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 21h ago

It's that kind of "missed it and it's gone" routine again. The 10% airdrop is definitely eye-catching. This round of gains is pretty good, but we'll have to see how long it can last. A smooth launch is indeed rare; most projects tend to falter right after going live. By the way, how many people actually received the airdrop, or has it once again become an illusion?

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 21h ago

It's that kind of storyline where missing out leads to regret. I actually missed the 10% airdrop. MARU definitely benefited this time, but those who reacted quickly benefited even more. This type of project follows a routine: smooth launch, paving the way with airdrops, and creating hype. Honestly, it's the same old story. Did anyone catch the peak at 4.1 million? Feels like that price is pretty inflated.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 21h ago

Information asymmetry is wealth gap; those who didn't keep up this time should reflect. --- 4.1 million? Still a bit虚 (uncertain/虚拟), is the depth really enough? --- Airdrop 10% is indeed a brilliant move; free riders can also participate. --- It's the same routine again; is it worth praising just because the launch went smoothly? Just normal performance. --- People who missed it are probably smashing their phones after reading this post haha. --- Is it really launched on time without obstacles? I've seen too many crashes. --- This is the reality of the market; those who know early always make money. --- The airdrop mechanism is good, but whether it can be sustained afterward is the real test.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleSurfer

· 21h ago

Missing out on airdrops is always the case for the majority, that's the reality. --- 4.1 million is indeed impressive, but the key is how to proceed afterward. --- I love projects that are sincere; no nonsense, just airdrops directly. --- The smooth experience is real, but how long this new project can last is uncertain. --- Information asymmetry in the crypto world is a matter of life and death; only a few are filtered out. --- This airdrop setup really attracts fans, unlike some projects that are stingy to the core. --- From 230 to 410, a good increase, but I'm worried about what will happen next. --- I've figured out the project team's tactics: first provide a good experience, then harvest the users, old trick. --- This is what should be learned: prioritize user experience.

View OriginalReply0