Hayden Adams recently responded to the controversy sparked by the income comparison across different DEX protocols. He pointed out that some benchmarking methods have obvious issues. For example, platforms like Aero recycle 100% of LP fees and then reward liquidity providers with tokens, which makes the on-paper income look very attractive. But here’s the problem—this model is fundamentally unsustainable. In simple terms, it’s just using token incentives to inflate the income figures.
More importantly, the actual returns for LPs are completely unpredictable because they depend heavily on the price fluctuations of third-party tokens. If that token crashes, the seemingly enticing incentives evaporate. Uniswap’s logic is different; it places more emphasis on a long-term reliable fee structure and ecosystem sustainability. This is also why the industry is beginning to reassess the true nature behind these "high-yield" models.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 01-06 06:12
Listen, this is the old trick in the crypto world. High returns are actually just a game of air coins.
Oh wait, Aero's model honestly can't fool me at all. When the token dumps, the LP has to admit defeat.
Actually, Hayden is not wrong; sustainability is the real key. Stacking incentives ultimately just amounts to a game of musical chairs.
Really, I've seen too many projects rely on token rewards to suck blood, only to see LPs lose everything. The fee logic of Uniswap is relatively honest.
Every new project uses this trick once, claiming they're different each time... hilarious.
By the way, how are the LPs over at Aero doing now? What's the token price looking like?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 01-05 15:19
Well... Aero's setup is just a castle in the air, once the tokens are dumped, they're gone
---
That's right, the incentives look high, but when they fall, it's truly despairing
---
Long-term stability vs short-term bubbles, which one to choose? Do I even need to say?
---
LP really needs to open their eyes, don't be blinded by the on-paper numbers
---
Sustainability is indeed much more appealing than high APY
---
Token rewards will eventually become unsustainable, Uni's approach is reliable
---
This is called sustainable development, not just a free ride
---
No matter how loud you boast, if the logic is rotten, it's still rotten
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 01-05 07:48
Huh? It's the same old "high-yield trap" routine... I'm already tired of Aero's approach, just hype tokens stacking numbers.
In reality, putting LP in is just gambling on the token not crashing, all that talk about sustainability is nonsense. Uniswap's approach is actually more reliable.
Honestly, these kinds of controversies are always the same; those who are going to get caught will still get caught.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fish
· 01-03 06:51
Basically, it's just about looking at the numbers and being impressed. Once the tokens crash, the true nature is revealed. The Uniswap model is indeed stable, but on the other hand, retail investors will still be fooled by high returns...
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-03 06:50
Haha, it's the same old trick again—token incentives piling up numbers... Looks impressive but it's all just paper wealth.
Basically, it's a gamble that the coin won't drop in value, right? Once there's a dump, LPs lose everything. Uni's approach is definitely more stable.
View OriginalReply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 01-03 06:49
Aero's approach is just empty promises; when the token dumps, LP is directly exploited for quick gains. Uniswap is truly aiming for long-term sustainability.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 01-03 06:46
The old tricks of the crypto world are back—getting jealous when seeing high returns, only to regret when the tokens crash.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 01-03 06:33
Basically, it's a numbers game, and this kind of incentive will eventually collapse.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-03 06:24
Oh my God, Aero's tricks have long been exposed. When the token drops, all investments are lost.
Hayden Adams recently responded to the controversy sparked by the income comparison across different DEX protocols. He pointed out that some benchmarking methods have obvious issues. For example, platforms like Aero recycle 100% of LP fees and then reward liquidity providers with tokens, which makes the on-paper income look very attractive. But here’s the problem—this model is fundamentally unsustainable. In simple terms, it’s just using token incentives to inflate the income figures.
More importantly, the actual returns for LPs are completely unpredictable because they depend heavily on the price fluctuations of third-party tokens. If that token crashes, the seemingly enticing incentives evaporate. Uniswap’s logic is different; it places more emphasis on a long-term reliable fee structure and ecosystem sustainability. This is also why the industry is beginning to reassess the true nature behind these "high-yield" models.