2026-01-02 19:22:37

The liquidity status of $RIVER is worth paying attention to. Just a 500,000 volume can push the price up to $0.5, indicating that market depth is relatively limited. Transaction fees are charged based on VIP level, so the actual liquidity cost is not high for large traders. Under this market structure, the cost of large capital operations like pump and dump is extremely low, making it easy for volatility to be artificially amplified.

For participants, it is important to understand the specific fee calculation logic and recognize the risks brought by insufficient liquidity. Both bullish and bearish operations require caution, as the small market cap liquidity characteristics make the price easily pushed up or dumped quickly.

From a technical perspective, such tokens often lack durability in their rebounds. Based on current liquidity and participation enthusiasm, if the market makers decide to sell off, the price is likely to encounter a significant pullback in the $63-65 range. This price zone usually becomes a key resistance level for bears. Before participating in such trades, be sure to assess your risk tolerance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasWrangler

· 3h ago

technically speaking, 50k volume moving price to $0.5 is demonstrably a liquidity desert... those fee tiers are literally designed to extract max value from retail while whales operate sub-optimal gas structures. the math just doesn't check out for sustainable movement here.

Reply0

MintMaster

· 3h ago

Wow, with 500,000, you can only hit 0.5? The liquidity is way too shallow. This is a playground for big players. Don't touch it, really, small trades like this. Be careful around the 63-65 range.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 3h ago

On-chain data shows that with just 500,000, you can start moving the market. This liquidity... I took a late-night look at the contract code, and it’s indeed interesting. The big players have such low costs, no surprise.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 4h ago

It's the same old trick again, small traders are just the cash machines for the manipulators. --- Can 500,000 push the price to 0.5? I just laughed. Isn't this just a naked pump-and-dump scheme? --- Low liquidity = high volatility. Anyone who understands this should stay away from RIVER. --- Waiting to see the dump at 63-65, this time the bearish pressure level probably won't hold. --- Lower VIP fees? Who benefits? Still the big players, retail investors continue to suffer heavy losses. --- Saying the rebound isn't lasting is right. These kinds of coins are just quick in-and-out trades; greed prevents you from making profits. --- Risk tolerance? Bro, I can't handle this kind of manipulation.

View OriginalReply0

orphaned_block

· 4h ago

Can you invest 500,000 to reach such a high? The liquidity is too shallow, definitely a playground for big players. --- I agree with the 63-65 range. Small-cap coins are just like this; rebounds are all fake. --- The low VIP fee rate is actually the most upsetting. Large investors can play freely, retail investors end up paying. --- It's these small tokens again, technical analysis is useless, it all depends on the market maker's mood. --- Lack of liquidity is truly a ticking time bomb, better not to touch it. --- Pushing 500,000 to 0.5? This coin is way too easy to manipulate, I think I'll pass. --- Haha, here we go again, always the same tricks. --- Risk tolerance? Just kidding, once you're in, you'll get swept away.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 4h ago

With just 500,000, you can reach 0.5. This liquidity is indeed thin. It's just a farming paradise, don't touch it. The 63-65 range is really a trap, don't go in. Small caps are just gambling; whether your mental preparation is enough is another matter.

View OriginalReply0