People often say that the core logic of different businesses is actually the same—honestly, this kind of view sounds lofty, but it’s basically useless. At best, it can serve as a conversation starter or a brain teaser, but it doesn’t translate into practical operations.



Take a few projects as examples. WeWork and NeoCloud both seem to have a carry-based business model, but how exactly do they operate, how do they make profits, and how do they break through growth bottlenecks? The differences are huge. Similar logic on paper, but the actual implementation is completely different. To truly understand a business, you need to start from specific details like market environment, user needs, and cost structure. You can’t just stay at the level of “underlying logic is the same” as an empty assertion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_traumavip
· 4h ago
The theoretical logic on paper is indeed different from actual operation, which is why those "套路论" (套路 theories) are just superficial and end there after hearing them.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 4h ago
Talking about strategies on paper is really pointless; the details are where the money is made.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 4h ago
The theoretical logic and actual operations are two different dimensions. Even the most similar models start to diverge when it comes to the details.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 5h ago
The logic on paper is the same, but when it comes to execution, there are two different paths. I agree with this point.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)