There is a common issue in the Resolution phase of market prediction—during execution, every wording of the rules can be scrutinized repeatedly, often leading to a dead end in textual analysis.

The most typical example is the controversy over the definition of token attributes. For instance, whether a project's token is truly a governance token can trigger days of voting stalemates, which often end up unresolved.

A more practical example is the price determination of Monad. At that time, price discrepancies arose due to liquidity differences across various exchanges—Upbit actually had better liquidity performance, but ultimately, the price from a certain compliant platform was used as the official reference. The logic behind this decision is indeed worth discussing; how to allocate the weights of liquidity depth and trading volume still has room for improvement.