Once tech giants establish ecological monopolies, they enter a cycle of the Matthew Effect—Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are all proof of this trajectory.
Think about your phone, how long has it been since you changed your apps? Alipay and WeChat have dominated China's payment industry for over ten years, and to this day, no third company has truly challenged them. This is the power of ecological monopoly.
In the future, new tech giants will definitely emerge. Companies like Palantir, Circle, and OpenAI indeed have potential. But for existing giants to decline? Extremely difficult. The capital, user base, and ecological barriers they control form a chasm that startups cannot bridge even in ten years.
NVIDIA has managed to stand out and carve out a space, mainly because its processor design domain is completely different from internet companies—it's not something you can copy. This technological barrier advantage is what makes breaking the current pattern possible. In the crypto market, stablecoin projects like USDC are also exploring differentiated paths, but shaking up the market landscape similarly requires time and innovation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybook
· 6h ago
Honestly, that's why I'm still stacking AAVE's APY. The current landscape can't be turned around at all.
Ecological barriers are like moats; it takes ten years for innovative projects to catch up. It's so hopeless.
Technical barriers are the only way out, but most projects can't even pass code audits.
Now, new projects rely entirely on marketing; the actual technical gap is like humans versus aliens compared to NVIDIA.
Talking about USDC shaking up the market? Don't be silly, the network effect of USDT is right there.
Once a monopoly forms, it's a vicious cycle. Capital concentrates at the top, and small players don't even have arbitrage opportunities.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 6h ago
Damn, it's very clear—big players' moat is just blocking you tightly.
Once tech giants establish ecological monopolies, they enter a cycle of the Matthew Effect—Microsoft, Google, and Amazon are all proof of this trajectory.
Think about your phone, how long has it been since you changed your apps? Alipay and WeChat have dominated China's payment industry for over ten years, and to this day, no third company has truly challenged them. This is the power of ecological monopoly.
In the future, new tech giants will definitely emerge. Companies like Palantir, Circle, and OpenAI indeed have potential. But for existing giants to decline? Extremely difficult. The capital, user base, and ecological barriers they control form a chasm that startups cannot bridge even in ten years.
NVIDIA has managed to stand out and carve out a space, mainly because its processor design domain is completely different from internet companies—it's not something you can copy. This technological barrier advantage is what makes breaking the current pattern possible. In the crypto market, stablecoin projects like USDC are also exploring differentiated paths, but shaking up the market landscape similarly requires time and innovation.