2026-01-02 15:21:41

Will privacy technology become a core topic in the crypto market by 2026? I think it's very likely. The key lies in the change of the underlying logic of the privacy track — evolving from a gray area suppressed by regulation to a necessity that meets compliance requirements.

What does this shift mean? It means privacy is no longer just a tool to counteract regulation, but has become a standard requirement for institutions and compliance platforms. As regulatory frameworks become clearer, they actually give privacy technologies a chance to breathe.

From an investment perspective, the privacy ecosystem is not limited to ZEC, the veteran player. There are several other promising directions in privacy computing and zero-knowledge proofs — some projects focused on privacy infrastructure, and teams developing privacy application layers. They may have good performance opportunities in 2026. The market may re-recognize that privacy technology is not a burden but a necessary path for Web3 to truly move towards institutionalization.

ZEC2,28%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainFries

· 01-05 11:50

This logic is indeed quite interesting—regulation has become the savior of privacy technology? It feels a bit magical. The opportunity to make money is always underestimated where privacy is concerned. Privacy has really been suppressed for a long time. ZEC has been lying dormant for so many years, and only now is it being recognized again... It’s indeed time for other projects to take the spotlight. Infrastructure teams working on zero-knowledge proofs are definitely more imaginative than just privacy coins. But to be honest, will institutions really pay for privacy? Or is it just another hype concept? It feels like 2026 might be the starting point of this wave, but it could also become the next forgotten narrative.

View OriginalReply0

PrivacyMaximalist

· 01-04 17:13

Hmm... Is regulation actually an opportunity? I need to think about this logic; it feels a bit counterintuitive. But on the other hand, ZEC has been around for so many years and still hasn't taken off. Can new projects really succeed?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 01-02 21:34

I agree with this logic. The shift of privacy from an "anti-surveillance tool" to a "compliance standard" is indeed a key turning point. However, ZEC has been somewhat low-profile in recent years, feeling overshadowed by other privacy projects. Can it really turn things around in 2026? The area of zero-knowledge proofs definitely has potential, but when will the market recognize the value of this technology? Who can say for sure? The conclusion that institutionalization = privacy necessity is a bit idealistic... It still depends on how policies are implemented. Wait, is this another signal that privacy coins are about to take off? I need to look into which potential projects are out there.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-02 15:50

Wow, this logical reversal is quite incredible... Privacy has shifted from an "antagonistic tool" to a "compliance standard," and regulation has become a booster? There's definitely something to it.

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinConnoisseur

· 01-02 15:49

This approach works. Privacy shifts from a gray area to a necessity, and then a regulatory-friendly turnaround... But to be honest, can this veteran ZEC hold its ground? It seems that zero-knowledge proofs are the real gold and silver.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetFreeloader

· 01-02 15:49

But to be honest, clear regulation is indeed a double-edged sword; it depends on how things develop next. ZEC is getting old; it depends on whether new projects can withstand the fight. I'm optimistic about privacy computing; I just don't know if it can come out by 2026. The logic makes sense, but the real profit still depends on who can target the institutions' needs. Zero-knowledge proofs have been popular for so long, but why does it still feel like there's no big movement?

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 01-02 15:48

Wake up, is privacy technology finally turning the tide? Regulations might actually become an advantage, I need to think about this logic... Can ZEC do it? It seems like not many people are using it, but the zero-knowledge proof part is definitely worth a look. Compliance requirements = privacy technology taking off? Not sure, but it's worth a gamble. That's right, only when institutions come in does privacy really have a place to showcase its usefulness. Can this round become a hot topic? It feels like the concept is far greater than the reality. Privacy infrastructure? Sounds a bit vague, where are the specific projects? But I must admit, the shift from being just a countermeasure to becoming a standard feature is quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

TopEscapeArtist

· 01-02 15:48

Cough, this logic sounds quite reasonable, but I just want to ask—what's the current technical outlook for ZEC? Are there any signs of a MACD golden cross? Feels like all these are just after-the-fact armchair analyses.

View OriginalReply0

UncleLiquidation

· 01-02 15:26

Haha, finally someone said it. Privacy has really been demonized too harshly before. Clear regulations are actually a good thing; no need to hide anymore... I agree with this logic. ZEC is old, but the infrastructure layer of zero-knowledge proofs is truly the real gold mine. If privacy becomes a necessity by 2026, those who have already laid out early will be laughing to death. Just don't create some "privacy concept" for hype again; there needs to be real substance.

View OriginalReply0

ThePathToRecouping5000U.

· 01-02 15:25

Trash, keeps falling

View OriginalReply0