ADI Chain is worth paying attention to, far more than just the superficial articles about MOU signing. What is truly interesting is the different design philosophy it represents. Currently, most blockchains operate in this way: starting from the use cases of cryptocurrencies to build a framework, then finding ways to connect to real-world applications. This "technology first, application second" approach has its own logic, but also brings compatibility issues. ADI Chain seems to be trying the opposite—thinking about blockchain architecture design from the actual needs side. This differentiated positioning is the most core innovation of the entire project. What kind of blockchain can be more aligned with reality? This is a question worth discussing thoroughly within the ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterXiao
· 12h ago
Reversing the technical architecture based on actual needs is indeed a fresh approach, but will it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezer
· 12h ago
Interesting, finally seeing a project that focuses on reverse thinking, most are still just hyping themselves up.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 12h ago
To be honest, thinking in reverse is indeed eye-opening, but the key is whether it can truly be implemented.
ADI Chain is worth paying attention to, far more than just the superficial articles about MOU signing. What is truly interesting is the different design philosophy it represents. Currently, most blockchains operate in this way: starting from the use cases of cryptocurrencies to build a framework, then finding ways to connect to real-world applications. This "technology first, application second" approach has its own logic, but also brings compatibility issues. ADI Chain seems to be trying the opposite—thinking about blockchain architecture design from the actual needs side. This differentiated positioning is the most core innovation of the entire project. What kind of blockchain can be more aligned with reality? This is a question worth discussing thoroughly within the ecosystem.