2025-12-27 08:40:55

#数字资产市场动态 The data for the recent DEX governance upgrade is astonishing—1.25 billion UNI tokens passed unanimously, with only 7.42 tokens voting against. What kind of consensus is this?

The subsequent actions are even more aggressive: burning 100 million tokens, while simultaneously activating the protocol fee mechanism for continuous burning in a dual cycle. In simple terms, the protocol has transformed from a pure tool into a truly revenue-generating asset.

But looking at $UNI's price performance, it's unbelievable—despite such a strong fundamental upgrade, the market hasn't reacted yet and is still digesting it. This kind of mismatch often hides opportunities. The liquidity landscape within the $ETH ecosystem's DEXs is also quietly adjusting, making it worth paying attention to the current deployment rhythm.

UNI4,82%

ETH0,18%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenGambler

· 5h ago

Only 7.42 votes against, the voting turnout is ridiculously low, is UNI's concentration lock-in or what?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 19h ago

Opposition votes of 7.42 are you trying to make me laugh to death? The level of consensus is really hard to come by. However, destroying 100 million tokens is indeed a bold move. I'm currently sitting on the gas tracker watching UNI's on-chain activity, and I have a feeling this mismatch won't last too long.

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_survivor

· 23h ago

Opposition votes: 7.42? Is this what they call "consensus"? Laughable, it's basically a one-man show. Destroy 100 million? Wow, how long does it take to see real results? It's normal for the market to react slowly. UNI is currently undervalued quite a bit; entering now might be early. Let's wait and see. I'm interested in liquidity rebalancing. Not many people are getting into DEXs right now. The fundamentals are so strong that they can't move the price, which means we still have to wait for the emotional cycle to turn to it. --- Wait, isn't this another pump-and-dump game by a whale? --- I've seen this double destruction cycle before; in the end, it just becomes a tool for price manipulation. --- Seven votes pass, but the governance participation is worrying. --- I'm optimistic about the future, but I won't go all-in now. Better to play it safe.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-44a00d6c

· 23h ago

Burn 100 million tokens? Is this operation real or just another trick to cut the leeks? The market hasn't reacted yet. Are you sure the whales aren't just eating up the chips? Should we buy the dip in this wave of UNI? Not sure in my heart.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 23h ago

Haha, this consensus level is really outrageous. Opposition votes of 7.42 coins, are they just messing around? Destroying 100 million coins in this move is indeed ruthless. I buy into the logic of turning tools into a blood-raising asset. $UNI's price response is really dragging down the market. The fundamentals are so strong but it still can't move up, which indeed makes it easy for surprises to happen. Wait, is this a good time to escape the top... I need to take another look.

View OriginalReply0