As the end of the year approaches, some projects in the crypto space definitely warrant a question mark. Without further ado, just looking at the setup of these projects can give you a sense of their level of dedication—especially MCH, which even developed its own public chain ecosystem, and a Web3 wallet from a major platform has supported it. At first glance, it seems quite impressive, but I dug deeper later and found that those so-called major collaborations are not really what they seem. What's more interesting is that these projects seem to have some subtle connections, with some inexplicable entanglements behind the scenes.



Honestly, the level of complexity in the primary market is much deeper than expected. When doing your research, you can't just rely on official promotions and ecosystem groundwork; you need to thoroughly investigate the details—track the flow of funds, verify the background of collaborations, and observe community discussions. Projects like $AR are worth continuous attention, but only if you stay sufficiently alert. One thing to say: be cautious, and even more cautious.
MCH-23,86%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VitaliksTwinvip
· 9h ago
The MCH public chain narrative looks impressive, but upon closer inspection, it's all tricks. Support from top wallets is also useless; the key question is where the real money is. After digging deeper, I realized that the primary market is like this: using flowery words to build an ecosystem, with partners all being fake. When you trace the funding chain, everything is exposed. There are indeed clues between these types of projects; it's not interesting. Doing homework also means watching where the money flows, and not being misled by propaganda. $AR is okay, but you need to keep your eyes open. One wrong move and you'll become a leek. Stay alert at all times.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715cvip
· 9h ago
I took a quick look, and MCH's setup is indeed a bit flimsy. They promote it very loudly, but once you peel back the layers, it all falls apart.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 9h ago
MCH's explanation is indeed unclear; a deep dive reveals all flaws. It's very common for project teams to collude with each other, and their methods of harvesting profits at the end of the year have been upgraded. There's hardly any genuine cooperation in the primary market; it's all just a facade. I've also looked into $AR, and there's nothing special about it. You need to stay highly vigilant. Just by looking at the ecosystem groundwork, you want to jump in? That's naive.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 9h ago
It's the same scam again... I saw through MCH a long time ago; the partnership background is fundamentally untrustworthy.
View OriginalReply0
NonFungibleDegenvip
· 9h ago
ngl ser, mch's "partnerships" giving me major red flags rn... checked the receipts and yeah, probably nothing but also definitely something. down bad on my due diligence honestly
Reply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick again. Let me tell you what's going on with MCH—looks glamorous on the surface, but behind the scenes, it's full of tricks. Honestly, the pitfalls in the primary market are even deeper than in the secondary. Don't be fooled by the ecosystem stories. The flow of funds is the real truth; everything else is just虚的
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)