Ziff Davis Under Scrutiny: Barclays Holds Equal-Weight as Institutions Slash Stakes

Layer2Observer · 2025-12-26T05:25:52+00:00

Barclays maintains an Equal-Weight stance on Ziff Davis despite a decrease in institutional holdings, as hedge funds cut exposure. While analysts project a 46.15% price increase, bearish sentiment prevails, signaling caution among investors.

Layer2Observer

2025-12-26 05:25:52

Abstract generation in progress

Barclays just maintained its Equal-Weight stance on Ziff Davis (ZD), but here’s the plot twist—institutional players are quietly cutting exposure. On November 10, 2025, the analyst firm signaled neither enthusiasm nor alarm about the small-cap stock, even as the broader investment community shows signs of cooling.

The Upside Promise vs. Reality Check

Paper gains look solid on surface: analysts peg the one-year price target at $47.09/share, suggesting 46.15% upside from the latest closing of $32.22. Some optimists see it hitting $63.00, while bears cap it at $40.40. Revenue projections land at 1,617MM (up 10.95%), and non-GAAP EPS sits at 7.45—numbers that justify moderate bullishness.

But Ziff Davis tells a different story through institutional behavior.

When Insiders Get Nervous

Here’s what’s actually happening in the real money world:

580 hedge funds and institutions currently hold positions in Ziff Davis, but this number decreased by 2 positions last quarter. More telling: the put/call ratio hit 1.20, reflecting decidedly bearish sentiment despite the upside targets.

The big players are exiting. Janus Henderson trimmed its stake from 3,569K shares (8.70% ownership) while simultaneously cutting portfolio allocation by 75.70%—a massive red flag. Legal & General similarly reduced allocation by 19.93% quarter-over-quarter, even after increasing share count. ArrowMark Colorado went further, ditching nearly a quarter of its 2,642K-share position.

Total institutional ownership actually contracted by 3.27% to 58,514K shares despite the 580 funds reporting holdings.

What This Means

Ziff Davis faces the classic investor dilemma: solid fundamentals on paper don’t always translate to conviction. While analysts maintain neutral positions and price targets suggest meaningful upside, the real money is voting with its feet—exiting or reducing bets across the board.

Barclays’ Equal-Weight call reads like a shrug: maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. The institutional exodus suggests the smart money isn’t betting heavily either way.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.