2025-12-24 19:21:43

Why do retail investors in the crypto circle always get cut? Basically, it's because there is no stable profit channel. Most players in the market operate independently, and relying on big capital to pump the market is now outdated.

Is there a possibility to change the approach? Instead of relying on financing, start from solving players' profit pain points. Use a low-threshold, genuinely profitable, and collaboratively buildable model to first attract a core group of deep consensus.

I am optimistic about the MEME track. It is currently at the forefront—using a gossip array-style architecture to accumulate traffic and funds, gradually breaking out from small communities. As the number of people grows, a siphon effect naturally forms. In the long run, this can create a stable, transparent ecosystem benchmark where everyone can profit. This is the correct way to open up Web3.

MEME1.1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

airdrop_whisperer

· 18h ago

Is this the same old rhetoric? It sounds nice, but how many can actually make money? --- MEME track trend? I think it's more like a new round of grass-cutting pretense. --- Low threshold really has returns? I've heard that for three years, still the same old tricks. --- Siphon effect sounds good, but in the end, it's still the retail investors' wallets that lose the most principal. --- Creating an ecological benchmark? Let's survive the next bear market first. --- Basically, it's a traffic game—who runs faster makes money, and later people are still the bagholders. --- This idea isn't new; it's the same old wine in a new bottle. --- I just want to know who is the final bagholder in this eight-trigram formation. --- I believe in MEME, but don't let me hear "stable profit" as a pipe dream. --- Small community breaking out requires large retail investors to enter, just a cycle repeating itself.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 18h ago

Sounds good, but the tactics of cutting leeks are just changing the soup without changing the ingredients. Stable profit? Bro, that word is a joke in the crypto circle. MEME breaking out of the circle... Someone has been promoting it like this for a long time, but how did it end up? Low threshold, real returns—why haven't I seen anyone get rich first? The correct way to open Web3? I'll talk after I see the returns.

View OriginalReply0

ser_we_are_ngmi

· 18h ago

It sounds good, but I've heard this theory too many times. Which project that can truly generate stable profits isn't dominated by early players? Can MEME siphon? To me, it looks like a game of farmers harvesting each other. The gossip array structure sounds impressive, but in the end, it's just a game for the whales.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 18h ago

Not bad, but can the MEME track really stay steady with this "eight trigrams formation" of gossip? I’ve seen too many grand narratives like this, and in the end, it’s still the fate of being cut for leeks. Actually, when will retail investors truly have a chance to win big? It all depends on whether someone truly makes the dividend mechanism transparent and writes the profit distribution into the code—that’s the core, not storytelling. Small communities are indeed easier to gather, but once they expand, things get chaotic. Then it’s another round of information gap exploitation... What do you think? This round is a bit interesting, but I still need to wait before jumping in. First, I’ll observe who is really doing the work.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 18h ago

Sounds good, but can the MEME track really produce a benchmark ecosystem? I think most are still just disguised ways of harvesting retail investors, just a change of narrative.

View OriginalReply0

shadowy_supercoder

· 18h ago

Say it nicely, but retail investors still have to pay tuition in the end. Is MEME really that magical? I don't think so. --- Low barrier, genuine returns... I've heard these words for three years, and I'm still getting cut. --- Guagua formation? Siphon effect? Bro, isn't this just old wine in new bottles, using a different concept to continue cutting? --- Wait, your logic has a problem. How can there be a breakout without financing? --- The hype about MEME being the next big trend is too optimistic; just surviving until the next quarter is good enough. --- Basically, it still depends on who runs away first. What are we talking about with ecosystem benchmarks? --- Deep consensus believers... you mean those bagholders, right?

View OriginalReply0