Robinhood Explains Why It Chose Ethereum Layer 2 Over L1

CryptoFrontNews
WHY7,34%
ETH-0,72%
L10,04%
  • Robinhood selected an Ethereum Layer 2 instead of a new Layer 1 due to decentralization concerns on some networks.
  • Company cited Ethereum’s strong infrastructure and interconnected liquidity across EVM ecosystems.
  • Strategy prioritizes accessibility and integration with existing financial and blockchain networks.

Robinhood’s crypto leadership has raised concerns about the structure of several non-Ethereum blockchains. Robinhood Crypto General Manager Johann Kerbrat discussed the company’s decision to build a Layer 2 network instead of launching a new Layer 1. Kerbrat pointed to decentralization concerns and liquidity access as key factors influencing that strategy.

Centralization Concerns Affect Some Layer 1 Networks

Johann Kerbrat said several large non-Ethereum Layer 1 networks still face centralization challenges. According to Kerbrat, certain incidents show validators restarting systems simultaneously during disruptions.

He explained that such coordinated restarts raise questions about decentralization. In contrast, Kerbrat said Ethereum provides established infrastructure that developers can rely on.

Because of that structure, builders can focus on applications rather than rebuilding core network components. Kerbrat described this foundation as security developers receive without additional engineering effort.

Therefore, teams can direct resources toward building services instead of maintaining base network functions. That difference, according to Kerbrat, influenced Robinhood’s technical decision.

Liquidity Access Shaped Robinhood’s Strategy

Beyond decentralization, Kerbrat highlighted liquidity access as another major factor. Ethereum connects with numerous EVM-compatible chains and decentralized applications.

According to Kerbrat, that interconnected liquidity environment offers advantages for financial services platforms. A project operating independently would struggle to attract the same network activity.

Kerbrat compared isolated networks to private islands. In such an environment, users and assets cannot easily move between ecosystems.

Robinhood, however, aims to build services that operate within a broader financial system. Kerbrat said the company wants open access rather than closed infrastructure.

Layer 2 Design Focuses on Accessibility

Kerbrat also addressed how Layer 2 economics can vary between projects. Some networks choose extremely low transaction fees, while others capture portions of Ethereum’s fee structure.

However, Kerbrat said Robinhood focused less on fee revenue during early planning. Instead, the company prioritized accessibility and integration with existing liquidity networks. That approach reflects the company’s broader goal for blockchain infrastructure.

Kerbrat said Robinhood intends to support financial systems operating directly on-chain. For that reason, the company selected a Layer 2 model connected to Ethereum rather than launching a separate Layer 1 chain.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Gerelateerde artikelen

Bitcoin Spot ETF Sees $467M Net Inflows Overnight, Ethereum ETF Records $97.5M

According to Farside monitoring data, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded net inflows of $467 million yesterday (May 5), with BlackRock's IBIT leading at $251 million, followed by Fidelity's FBTC with $133 million and ARK's ARKB with $92.3 million. VanEck's HODL and Grayscale's GBTC experienced minor ou

GateNews2u geleden

Trader 'pension-usdt.eth' Faces $18M in Unrealized Losses on BTC Shorts as Hyperliquid's Largest Loss Address

According to BlockBeats citing Hyperinsight, on May 6, trader 'pension-usdt.eth' accumulated $18 million in unrealized losses on Hyperliquid after holding BTC short positions for over 35 days amid Bitcoin's rally above $81,000. The address is now the platform's largest loss maker in the past 7

GateNews2u geleden

以太坊「代幣化美國公債」市值創 80 億美元歷史新高

據 Token Terminal 於 5 月 6 日在 X 發布數據,部署在以太坊上的代幣化美國國債總市值已升至約 80 億美元,創歷史新高,過去六個月增長約 100%;同日,以太坊聯合創辦人 Joseph Lubin 在邁阿密 Consensus Miami 2026 大會表示,全球經濟代幣化已不可避免。

MarketWhisper3u geleden

Bitmine Stakes Additional 157,344 ETH, Total Staked Reaches 4.71M ETH

According to Onchain Lens, Bitmine staked an additional 157,344 ETH (worth approximately $372.39 million) in a recent transaction. The validator's cumulative staked ETH now totals 4,712,917 ETH, valued at approximately $11.12

GateNews4u geleden

Hyperliquid's Largest ETH Bull Adds 99,000 ETH Position Worth $234M, Up $9M Unrealized Gain

According to ChainCatcher, a major whale on Hyperliquid, monitored by crypto analyst Ember Chen, has accumulated a new long position in Ethereum. The whale now holds 99,000 ETH worth approximately $234 million with an average entry price of $2,270 per coin, currently showing an unrealized gain

GateNews4u geleden
Opmerking
0/400
Geen opmerkingen